Rajendran M vs Sub inspector of police — 9/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSA180000082026
e-Filing Number
03-01-2026
Filing Number
8/2026
Filing Date
03-01-2026
Registration No
9/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendran M
Adv. SELVARAJA K.S.SELVARAJA
Respondent(s)
Sub inspector of police
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 04-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 03-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 26-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate allowed M. Rajendran's petition and granted interim custody of his seized Ashok Leyland Tipper Lorry (Reg. TN.24.AX.8791) on the grounds that the vehicle was not actually used in committing the alleged offense, no confiscation proceedings could be initiated (as police lack authority to register FIRs under the Mines and Minerals Act), and retaining it would cause deterioration and financial hardship. The release was conditioned on executing a ₹1 lakh bond with sureties, sworn affidavits, photographs, panchnama documentation, and undertakings not to sell or use it unlawfully. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate allowed M. Rajendran's petition and granted interim custody of his seized Ashok Leyland Tipper Lorry (Reg. TN.24.AX.8791) on the grounds that the vehicle was not actually used in committing the alleged offense, no confiscation proceedings could be initiated (as police lack authority to register FIRs under the Mines and Minerals Act), and retaining it would cause deterioration and financial hardship. The release was conditioned on executing a ₹1 lakh bond with sureties, sworn affidavits, photographs, panchnama documentation, and undertakings not to sell or use it unlawfully. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts