Rajendran M vs Sub inspector of police — 9/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNSA180000082026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-01-2026

Filing Number

8/2026

Filing Date

03-01-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

06-01-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

Rajendran M

Adv. SELVARAJA K.S.SELVARAJA

Respondent(s)

Sub inspector of police

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur

07-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

Enquiry

04-03-2026

Enquiry

03-03-2026

Enquiry

26-02-2026

Enquiry

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Copy of Judicial/Revenue proceedings.

The Judicial Magistrate allowed M. Rajendran's petition and granted interim custody of his seized Ashok Leyland Tipper Lorry (Reg. TN.24.AX.8791) on the grounds that the vehicle was not actually used in committing the alleged offense, no confiscation proceedings could be initiated (as police lack authority to register FIRs under the Mines and Minerals Act), and retaining it would cause deterioration and financial hardship. The release was conditioned on executing a ₹1 lakh bond with sureties, sworn affidavits, photographs, panchnama documentation, and undertakings not to sell or use it unlawfully. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate allowed M. Rajendran's petition and granted interim custody of his seized Ashok Leyland Tipper Lorry (Reg. TN.24.AX.8791) on the grounds that the vehicle was not actually used in committing the alleged offense, no confiscation proceedings could be initiated (as police lack authority to register FIRs under the Mines and Minerals Act), and retaining it would cause deterioration and financial hardship. The release was conditioned on executing a ₹1 lakh bond with sureties, sworn affidavits, photographs, panchnama documentation, and undertakings not to sell or use it unlawfully. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case