Rajammal and Two others vs Palanisamy Advocate - MUTHUKUMARAN. M. — 199/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1to6. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA170002852022

Filing Number

381/2022

Filing Date

15-Dec-2022

Registration No

199/2022

Registration Date

15-Dec-2022

Court

District Munisf Court, Mettur

Judge

2-District Munsif, Mettur

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1to6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajammal and Two others

    Adv. KATHIRAVAN. P.

  2. 2.Vivekanandhan

    Adv. KATHIRAVAN. P.

  3. 3.Srinivasan

    Adv. KATHIRAVAN. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Palanisamy Advocate - MUTHUKUMARAN. M.

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  5. 10-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  6. 11-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  7. 15-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  8. 21-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  9. 17-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  10. 11-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  11. 17-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  12. 02-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  13. 03-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  14. 07-Feb-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  15. 02-Jan-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  16. 06-Nov-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  17. 04-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  18. 26-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  19. 15-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  20. 23-Apr-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  21. 20-Feb-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  22. 20-Feb-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  23. 20-Feb-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  24. 20-Feb-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The District Civil Court at Mattur granted a temporary injunction petition filed by three plaintiffs against the defendant regarding a disputed property (tavva property). The court found that the plaintiffs established ownership of the property through inheritance and have the right to exclusive possession, while the defendant unlawfully encroached on approximately 250-300 square feet of the property and constructed a building thereon in July 2022 in violation of their rights. The court ordered that no alterations or sales of the encroached property shall be made pending final disposal of the case, and permitted the matter to proceed to full trial on merits based on documentary evidence without conducting a mini-trial at the interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  25. 20-Feb-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  26. 05-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  27. 20-Dec-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  28. 18-Oct-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  29. 09-Sep-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  30. 18-Aug-2023

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif, Mettur

  31. 18-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  32. 08-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  33. 13-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  34. 19-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  35. 15-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 15-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 199/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Civil Court at Mattur granted a temporary injunction petition filed by three plaintiffs against the defendant regarding a disputed property (tavva property). The court found that the plaintiffs established ownership of the property through inheritance and have the right to exclusive possession, while the defendant unlawfully encroached on approximately 250-300 square feet of the property and constructed a building thereon in July 2022 in violation of their rights. The court ordered that no alterations or sales of the encroached property shall be made pending final disposal of the case, and permitted the matter to proceed to full trial on merits based on documentary evidence without conducting a mini-trial at the interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case