Rajammal and Two others vs Palanisamy Advocate - MUTHUKUMARAN. M. — 199/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1to6. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170002852022
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
381/2022
Filing Date
15-12-2022
Registration No
199/2022
Registration Date
15-12-2022
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajammal and Two others
Adv. KATHIRAVAN. P.
Vivekanandhan
Adv. KATHIRAVAN. P.
Srinivasan
Adv. KATHIRAVAN. P.
Respondent(s)
Palanisamy Advocate - MUTHUKUMARAN. M.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 10-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 06-02-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 10-12-2025 | IA Pending | |
| 11-11-2025 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Civil Court at Mattur granted a temporary injunction petition filed by three plaintiffs against the defendant regarding a disputed property (tavva property). The court found that the plaintiffs established ownership of the property through inheritance and have the right to exclusive possession, while the defendant unlawfully encroached on approximately 250-300 square feet of the property and constructed a building thereon in July 2022 in violation of their rights. The court ordered that no alterations or sales of the encroached property shall be made pending final disposal of the case, and permitted the matter to proceed to full trial on merits based on documentary evidence without conducting a mini-trial at the interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Civil Court at Mattur granted a temporary injunction petition filed by three plaintiffs against the defendant regarding a disputed property (tavva property). The court found that the plaintiffs established ownership of the property through inheritance and have the right to exclusive possession, while the defendant unlawfully encroached on approximately 250-300 square feet of the property and constructed a building thereon in July 2022 in violation of their rights. The court ordered that no alterations or sales of the encroached property shall be made pending final disposal of the case, and permitted the matter to proceed to full trial on merits based on documentary evidence without conducting a mini-trial at the interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts