Rajammal and Two others vs Palanisamy Advocate - MUTHUKUMARAN. M. — 199/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1to6. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA170002852022

IA Pending

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

381/2022

Filing Date

15-12-2022

Registration No

199/2022

Registration Date

15-12-2022

Court

District Munisf Court, Mettur

Judge

2-District Munsif, Mettur

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O7R1to6

Petitioner(s)

Rajammal and Two others

Adv. KATHIRAVAN. P.

Vivekanandhan

Adv. KATHIRAVAN. P.

Srinivasan

Adv. KATHIRAVAN. P.

Respondent(s)

Palanisamy Advocate - MUTHUKUMARAN. M.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur

15-04-2026

IA Pending

10-03-2026

IA Pending

06-02-2026

IA Pending

10-12-2025

IA Pending

11-11-2025

IA Pending

Interim Orders

20-02-2024
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The District Civil Court at Mattur granted a temporary injunction petition filed by three plaintiffs against the defendant regarding a disputed property (tavva property). The court found that the plaintiffs established ownership of the property through inheritance and have the right to exclusive possession, while the defendant unlawfully encroached on approximately 250-300 square feet of the property and constructed a building thereon in July 2022 in violation of their rights. The court ordered that no alterations or sales of the encroached property shall be made pending final disposal of the case, and permitted the matter to proceed to full trial on merits based on documentary evidence without conducting a mini-trial at the interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Civil Court at Mattur granted a temporary injunction petition filed by three plaintiffs against the defendant regarding a disputed property (tavva property). The court found that the plaintiffs established ownership of the property through inheritance and have the right to exclusive possession, while the defendant unlawfully encroached on approximately 250-300 square feet of the property and constructed a building thereon in July 2022 in violation of their rights. The court ordered that no alterations or sales of the encroached property shall be made pending final disposal of the case, and permitted the matter to proceed to full trial on merits based on documentary evidence without conducting a mini-trial at the interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munisf Court, Mettur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case