Madhu @ Madhammal and 2 others vs Rangammal and 4 others Advocate - V. Ranadev — 189/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1to6. Status: Additional Issues. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170002722022
Filing Number
363/2022
Filing Date
25-Nov-2022
Registration No
189/2022
Registration Date
25-Nov-2022
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Madhu @ Madhammal and 2 others
Adv. Sathiyapriya
-
2.Rajagopal
-
3.Seenivasan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rangammal and 4 others Advocate - V. Ranadev
-
2.Krishanan
Adv. V. Ranadev
-
3.Perumal
-
4.Thangavel
-
5.Selvam
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Apr-2026
Additional Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
02-Apr-2026
Additional Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Mar-2026
Additional Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
23-Feb-2026
Additional Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
20-Jan-2026
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Dec-2025
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
06-Nov-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The District Munsif Court at Mettur allowed the plaintiffs' petition to amend their plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC. The plaintiffs sought to add a prayer for mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove an alleged encroachment of 276 sqft on their property and restore vacant possession, discovered through an advocate commissioner's report filed in 2023. The court rejected the defendants' objections regarding limitation and contradictions in the commissioner's report, holding these matters should be decided in the main suit proceedings, and allowed the amendment in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
23-Oct-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
16-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
09-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
06-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
02-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
12-Jun-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
16-Apr-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Mar-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Feb-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
25-Nov-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
27-Aug-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
27-Jun-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
02-Apr-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Jan-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Oct-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
12-Sep-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
17-Aug-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
25-Jul-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
14-Jun-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
30-Mar-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
20-Feb-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
19-Jan-2023
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
19-Jan-2023
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
19-Jan-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Jan-2023
Appearance
District Munsif, Mettur
-
25-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 189/2022
Summary: The District Munsif Court at Mettur allowed the plaintiffs' petition to amend their plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC. The plaintiffs sought to add a prayer for mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove an alleged encroachment of 276 sqft on their property and restore vacant possession, discovered through an advocate commissioner's report filed in 2023. The court rejected the defendants' objections regarding limitation and contradictions in the commissioner's report, holding these matters should be decided in the main suit proceedings, and allowed the amendment in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts