Madhu @ Madhammal and 2 others vs Rangammal and 4 others Advocate - V. Ranadev — 189/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1to6. Status: Additional Issues. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA170002722022

Additional Issues

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

363/2022

Filing Date

25-11-2022

Registration No

189/2022

Registration Date

25-11-2022

Court

District Munisf Court, Mettur

Judge

2-District Munsif, Mettur

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O7R1to6

Petitioner(s)

Madhu @ Madhammal and 2 others

Adv. Sathiyapriya

Rajagopal

Seenivasan

Respondent(s)

Rangammal and 4 others Advocate - V. Ranadev

Krishanan

Adv. V. Ranadev

Perumal

Thangavel

Selvam

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur

29-04-2026

Additional Issues

02-04-2026

Additional Issues

10-03-2026

Additional Issues

23-02-2026

Additional Issues

20-01-2026

Additional Written Statement

Interim Orders

06-11-2025
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The District Munsif Court at Mettur allowed the plaintiffs' petition to amend their plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC. The plaintiffs sought to add a prayer for mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove an alleged encroachment of 276 sqft on their property and restore vacant possession, discovered through an advocate commissioner's report filed in 2023. The court rejected the defendants' objections regarding limitation and contradictions in the commissioner's report, holding these matters should be decided in the main suit proceedings, and allowed the amendment in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsif Court at Mettur allowed the plaintiffs' petition to amend their plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC. The plaintiffs sought to add a prayer for mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove an alleged encroachment of 276 sqft on their property and restore vacant possession, discovered through an advocate commissioner's report filed in 2023. The court rejected the defendants' objections regarding limitation and contradictions in the commissioner's report, holding these matters should be decided in the main suit proceedings, and allowed the amendment in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munisf Court, Mettur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case