R.Subramaniam vs The Assistant Commissioner HR and CE,Salem and 1 Advocate - Govt Pleader — 186/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7R1-6. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Trial Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA170002552023

Filing Number

361/2023

Filing Date

09-Oct-2023

Registration No

186/2023

Registration Date

11-Oct-2023

Court

District Munisf Court, Mettur

Judge

2-District Munsif, Mettur

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7R1-6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.Subramaniam

    Adv. GOPINATH. P.

  2. 2.N.Venkatachalam

  3. 3.C.N.Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Assistant Commissioner HR and CE,Salem and 1 Advocate - Govt Pleader

  2. 2.The Executive officer,

    Adv. Govt Pleader

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  5. 09-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  6. 25-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  7. 19-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  8. 01-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  9. 19-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  10. 17-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  11. 20-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  12. 12-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  13. 13-Nov-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  14. 24-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  15. 08-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  16. 04-Jun-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  17. 04-Jun-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  18. 04-Jun-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  19. 04-Jun-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary Court: District Civil Court, Mettur (Tamil Nadu) Date: June 4, 2024 Outcome: The petition is dismissed without costs. The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for a permanent injunction and interim injunction against the temple authorities regarding access rights to a pathway (Schedule D property) leading to their properties. The court held that a full trial on the merits is necessary to determine disputed factual issues, and interim relief should not be granted at this stage based on a "mini trial." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 04-Jun-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  21. 25-Apr-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  22. 28-Mar-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  23. 13-Mar-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  24. 19-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  25. 14-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  26. 09-Feb-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  27. 01-Feb-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif, Mettur

  28. 18-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  29. 20-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  30. 06-Nov-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif, Mettur

  31. 11-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 09-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 186/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court: District Civil Court, Mettur (Tamil Nadu) Date: June 4, 2024 Outcome: The petition is dismissed without costs. The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for a permanent injunction and interim injunction against the temple authorities regarding access rights to a pathway (Schedule D property) leading to their properties. The court held that a full trial on the merits is necessary to determine disputed factual issues, and interim relief should not be granted at this stage based on a "mini trial." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case