Chinnappan vs Natesan — 194/2025

Summary: The court petition was allowed. The District Munsif appointed Advocate Mr. N. Manikandan as an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the suit properties and investigate the existence of a disputed pathway claimed by the petitioner (Chinnappan), noting its physical features with assistance from the Village Administrative Officer and Qualified Surveyor, with a report due by 15.12.2025. The petitioner sought declaration of easement rights over a common pathway in his brother's property to access his own agricultural land containing 60 coconut trees, which the respondent allegedly obstructed with iron fences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.