Chinnappan vs Natesan — 194/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/o7r1-6. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 07-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA170002482025

Filing Number

312/2025

Filing Date

13-Nov-2025

Registration No

194/2025

Registration Date

13-Nov-2025

Court

District Munisf Court, Mettur

Judge

2-District Munsif, Mettur

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section u/o7r1-6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chinnappan

    Adv. STALIN RAJA L

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Natesan

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  3. 29-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  4. 15-Dec-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The court petition was allowed. The District Munsif appointed Advocate Mr. N. Manikandan as an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the suit properties and investigate the existence of a disputed pathway claimed by the petitioner (Chinnappan), noting its physical features with assistance from the Village Administrative Officer and Qualified Surveyor, with a report due by 15.12.2025. The petitioner sought declaration of easement rights over a common pathway in his brother's property to access his own agricultural land containing 60 coconut trees, which the respondent allegedly obstructed with iron fences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 194/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court petition was allowed. The District Munsif appointed Advocate Mr. N. Manikandan as an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the suit properties and investigate the existence of a disputed pathway claimed by the petitioner (Chinnappan), noting its physical features with assistance from the Village Administrative Officer and Qualified Surveyor, with a report due by 15.12.2025. The petitioner sought declaration of easement rights over a common pathway in his brother's property to access his own agricultural land containing 60 coconut trees, which the respondent allegedly obstructed with iron fences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case