PALANIYAMMAL vs PALANISAMY Advocate - MOHANRAM.S — 155/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA170002302022

Filing Number

306/2022

Filing Date

29-Sep-2022

Registration No

155/2022

Registration Date

30-Sep-2022

Court

District Munisf Court, Mettur

Judge

2-District Munsif, Mettur

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PALANIYAMMAL

    Adv. R.RAJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PALANISAMY Advocate - MOHANRAM.S

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  3. 30-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  4. 17-Dec-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The District Munsif Court, Mettur allowed the petition and granted permission to implead Respondents 2 and 3 (Rathinavel and Siddaiyan) as defendants 2 and 3 in the partition suit. The court held that both proposed parties are necessary and proper parties to the suit, as Respondent 2 claims rights through an alleged will, and Respondent 3 is a pendente lite purchaser whose interests would be substantially affected. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 17-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  6. 12-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  8. 27-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  9. 11-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  10. 15-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  11. 08-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  12. 04-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  13. 01-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  14. 04-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  15. 10-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  16. 09-Jan-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  17. 06-Nov-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  18. 30-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  19. 29-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  20. 30-Apr-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  21. 29-Jan-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  22. 20-Dec-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  23. 04-Nov-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  24. 26-Sep-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  25. 02-Aug-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  26. 08-Jun-2023

    Appearance

    District Munsif, Mettur

  27. 01-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  28. 01-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  29. 01-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  30. 30-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 29-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 155/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsif Court, Mettur allowed the petition and granted permission to implead Respondents 2 and 3 (Rathinavel and Siddaiyan) as defendants 2 and 3 in the partition suit. The court held that both proposed parties are necessary and proper parties to the suit, as Respondent 2 claims rights through an alleged will, and Respondent 3 is a pendente lite purchaser whose interests would be substantially affected. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case