PALANIYAMMAL vs PALANISAMY Advocate - MOHANRAM.S — 155/2022

Summary: The District Munsif Court, Mettur allowed the petition and granted permission to implead Respondents 2 and 3 (Rathinavel and Siddaiyan) as defendants 2 and 3 in the partition suit. The court held that both proposed parties are necessary and proper parties to the suit, as Respondent 2 claims rights through an alleged will, and Respondent 3 is a pendente lite purchaser whose interests would be substantially affected. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.