Sengoda gounder and 2 others vs Vasanthamani and 5 others Advocate - Mr.N.Sasikumar — 149/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s7R1-6. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA170002222022

Filing Number

297/2022

Filing Date

21-Sep-2022

Registration No

149/2022

Registration Date

26-Sep-2022

Court

District Munisf Court, Mettur

Judge

2-District Munsif, Mettur

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s7R1-6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sengoda gounder and 2 others

    Adv. JAGANATHAN M

  2. 2.Nachammal

    Adv. JAGANATHAN M

  3. 3.Deivasigamani

    Adv. JAGANATHAN M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vasanthamani and 5 others Advocate - Mr.N.Sasikumar

  2. 2.Minor Mithilesh

  3. 3.Rajammal

    Adv. Mr.N.Sasikumar

  4. 4.Saranya

    Adv. Mr.N.Sasikumar

  5. 5.Minor Elakiya

  6. 6.K.Thangavel

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The District Munsif Court allowed petitions filed by Defendants 1, 3, and 4 to set aside ex-parte orders dated 21.12.2023, but imposed conditions. The petitioners must pay Rs. 3,000 as cost to the respondents/plaintiffs on or before 19.01.2026; failure to do so will result in dismissal of the petition. The court granted the petitioners another opportunity to establish their defense in the original suit concerning rights of access through specified cart tracks and pathways. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  9. 03-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  10. 24-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  11. 12-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  12. 16-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  13. 16-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  14. 10-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  15. 12-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  16. 10-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  17. 24-Jul-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  18. 18-Jun-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  19. 25-Mar-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  20. 08-Feb-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  21. 21-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  22. 23-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  23. 04-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  24. 22-Aug-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  25. 04-Jul-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  26. 01-Jun-2023

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  27. 25-Apr-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  28. 09-Mar-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  29. 12-Jan-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  30. 23-Dec-2022

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  31. 21-Dec-2022

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  32. 22-Nov-2022

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  33. 26-Oct-2022

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  34. 26-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 21-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 149/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsif Court allowed petitions filed by Defendants 1, 3, and 4 to set aside ex-parte orders dated 21.12.2023, but imposed conditions. The petitioners must pay Rs. 3,000 as cost to the respondents/plaintiffs on or before 19.01.2026; failure to do so will result in dismissal of the petition. The court granted the petitioners another opportunity to establish their defense in the original suit concerning rights of access through specified cart tracks and pathways. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case