P.Rajenderan vs P.Goundappan and one other Advocate - SADHASIVAM. I. K. — 138/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S VIIR1to6. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170002062022
Filing Number
276/2022
Filing Date
27-Aug-2022
Registration No
138/2022
Registration Date
27-Aug-2022
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.Rajenderan
Adv. VAITHILINGAM. V
Respondent(s)
-
1.P.Goundappan and one other Advocate - SADHASIVAM. I. K.
-
2.G. Umasiva Nagarajan
Adv. SADHASIVAM. I. K.
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Feb-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The District Munsif Court at Mettur dismissed the plaintiff's petition seeking to amend the plaint schedule under CPC Order 6 Rule 17. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide valid reasons for the amendment nearly 4 years after filing the suit, and the original plaint contained no averments regarding the 0.05-cent pathway he sought to include, making the proposed amendment impermissible. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Feb-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
30-Jan-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
29-Jan-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
19-Jan-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
11-Dec-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
19-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
13-Oct-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
08-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
15-Apr-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
13-Mar-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
30-Jan-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Dec-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
14-Oct-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
06-Sep-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
29-Jul-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Jun-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
04-Jun-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
04-Jun-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
04-Jun-2024
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
04-Jun-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Apr-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
26-Mar-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
14-Mar-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Mar-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
15-Feb-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
08-Jan-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
13-Dec-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Dec-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
23-Nov-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
14-Nov-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Oct-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
27-Sep-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
23-Aug-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
26-Jul-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
22-Jun-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Apr-2023
Appearance
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Feb-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
14-Dec-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
27-Sep-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
27-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 138/2022
Summary The District Munsif Court at Mettur dismissed the plaintiff's petition seeking to amend the plaint schedule under CPC Order 6 Rule 17. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide valid reasons for the amendment nearly 4 years after filing the suit, and the original plaint contained no averments regarding the 0.05-cent pathway he sought to include, making the proposed amendment impermissible. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts