Sidhan .M vs Madhu. P and one another — 33/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER21RULE35OFCPC. Disposed: Uncontested--Terminated on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNSA170002012025

e-Filing Number

02-09-2025

Filing Number

253/2025

Filing Date

22-Sep-2025

Registration No

33/2025

Registration Date

22-Sep-2025

Court

District Munisf Court, Mettur

Judge

2-District Munsif, Mettur

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Terminated

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER21RULE35OFCPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sidhan .M

    Adv. TAMIZHARASAN R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Madhu. P and one another

  2. 2.Murugan. P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The District Munsif Court of Mettur terminated the petition filed by Sidhan M against Madhu P and another, as the delivery warrant had been executed and the property was already delivered. Since the petitioner conceded this fact, the court closed the case in the interest of justice with no cost awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif, Mettur

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Mettur

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Mettur

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Mettur

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Mettur

  8. 01-Nov-2025

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  9. 01-Nov-2025

    Batta

    District Munsif, Mettur

  10. 23-Oct-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Mettur

  11. 22-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 22-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif Court of Mettur terminated the petition filed by Sidhan M against Madhu P and another, as the delivery warrant had been executed and the property was already delivered. Since the petitioner conceded this fact, the court closed the case in the interest of justice with no cost awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case