Pandurangan vs Perumal and 3 others Advocate - SENTHILKUMAR. M. P. — 154/2020
Case under Suits Valuation Act Section O7R1to6. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170001932020
Filing Number
278/2020
Filing Date
30-Sep-2020
Registration No
154/2020
Registration Date
01-Oct-2020
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pandurangan
Adv. Senthilkumar S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Perumal and 3 others Advocate - SENTHILKUMAR. M. P.
-
2.Gangadharan
Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. M. P.
-
3.Arulkumar
Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. M. P.
-
4.Manimegalai
Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. M. P.
Case History
-
01-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
02-Apr-2026
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Mar-2026
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
11-Feb-2026
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
23-Jan-2026
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Dec-2025
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Dec-2025
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
17-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
28-Oct-2025
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
14-Oct-2025
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
15-Sep-2025
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
26-Aug-2025
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
07-Aug-2025
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Jul-2025
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Jun-2025
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
27-Mar-2025
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
30-Jan-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
30-Jan-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: I.M. No. 03/2024 | District Court, Madurai | January 30, 2025 Outcome: The petition is allowed. The court ordered that petitioners M. Yasodha, M. Somasundaram, and M. Ramachandran be added as defendants 5-7 in the original suit regarding partition and permanent injunction of joint family property. The court found the petitioners are necessary parties to the case as they are heirs of Murthy and have legitimate rights over the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jan-2025
Steps
District Munsif, Mettur
-
16-Dec-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
16-Nov-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
15-Oct-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Sep-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
08-Jul-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
24-Jun-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
15-Apr-2024
Part Heard
District Munsif, Mettur
-
26-Feb-2024
Part Heard
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Jan-2024
Part Heard
District Munsif, Mettur
-
21-Nov-2023
Part Heard
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Oct-2023
Part Heard
District Munsif, Mettur
-
02-Sep-2023
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
02-Sep-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Aug-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
22-Jun-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
29-Mar-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
25-Jan-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
25-Nov-2022
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
07-Sep-2022
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
01-Jul-2022
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
22-Apr-2022
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
01-Feb-2022
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
01-Dec-2021
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
22-Sep-2021
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
11-Sep-2021
Appearance
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Jul-2021
Appearance
District Munsif, Mettur
-
16-Apr-2021
Appearance
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Mar-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
19-Feb-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
20-Jan-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
02-Dec-2020
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Nov-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Sep-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 154/2020
Court Order Summary Case: I.M. No. 03/2024 | District Court, Madurai | January 30, 2025 Outcome: The petition is allowed. The court ordered that petitioners M. Yasodha, M. Somasundaram, and M. Ramachandran be added as defendants 5-7 in the original suit regarding partition and permanent injunction of joint family property. The court found the petitioners are necessary parties to the case as they are heirs of Murthy and have legitimate rights over the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts