Mariammal. B vs Amaravathi. P and 37 others — 20009/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7R1-6. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170001812013
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
20009/2013
Filing Date
07-01-2013
Registration No
20009/2013
Registration Date
07-01-2013
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mariammal. B
Adv. A.M.C.Periyaswamy
Respondent(s)
Amaravathi. P and 37 others
Ayyamuthu. P
Vaithilingam. M
Muthammal. C
Kokila. A
Angamuthu. M
Narayanasamy. M
Arumugam
Anandh
Senthil
Chinnaiyan
Vishwanathan
Varadharajan
Lakshmiammal
Poornaiyan
Govindharaj
Thavamani
Paneerselvam
Pappathiyammal
Kamalam
Saroja
Thamilarasi
Vijayakumar
Ranjithkumar
Kumudhavalli
Sedhuvarayan
Thamil Selvan
Komadha Selvi
Sampooranam
Kalaiselvi
Elankathiravan
Ragul Gandhi
Sowmiya
Manivannan
Karpagavalli
Ponnaya
Arivalagan
Indra
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 03-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 18-02-2026 | Amendment |
| 13-01-2026 | Amendment |
| 19-12-2025 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
Summary The Madurai District Court allowed the petition and granted an exemption under the Civil Procedure Code Order 22 Rule 4(4), permitting the plaintiff to proceed with the case without substituting the legal representatives of two deceased defendants (Respondents 1 and 9, who died on 22.10.2022 and 06.04.2023 respectively). The court exempted the plaintiff from the requirement to substitute the heirs of the deceased defendants as parties to avoid unnecessary delays in case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Madurai District Court allowed the petition and granted an exemption under the Civil Procedure Code Order 22 Rule 4(4), permitting the plaintiff to proceed with the case without substituting the legal representatives of two deceased defendants (Respondents 1 and 9, who died on 22.10.2022 and 06.04.2023 respectively). The court exempted the plaintiff from the requirement to substitute the heirs of the deceased defendants as parties to avoid unnecessary delays in case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts