Raji vs Thayammal and 7 others Advocate - Eswaramoorthy S — 123/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Or7R1to6. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170001532023
Filing Number
210/2023
Filing Date
21-Jun-2023
Registration No
123/2023
Registration Date
21-Jun-2023
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raji
Adv. VELMURUGAN. C.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Thayammal and 7 others Advocate - Eswaramoorthy S
-
2.Nallammal
Adv. Eswaramoorthy S
-
3.Chinnaponnu
-
4.Thangavel
-
5.Palanisamy
Adv. Prakash A
-
6.Vijiya
Adv. Prakash A
-
7.Palanisamy
Adv. Prakash A
-
8.S.Rathi
Adv. MUTHAMILSELVAN.G
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
09-Apr-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
17-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
12-Feb-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
12-Jan-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
08-Oct-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
23-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
08-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
14-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
30-Jun-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
01-Apr-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Mar-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
03-Mar-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The petition filed under the CPC Order 39 Rules 1, 2 and Section 151 seeking a permanent injunction against the respondents regarding disputed agricultural land (0.22 cents in survey no. 311/4A4) in Madura district is dismissed without costs. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, prove irreparable loss, or present sufficient documentary evidence to support the claims. Additionally, the court determined that the matter involves complex property disputes and shared ownership issues that cannot be adequately determined through a temporary injunction application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Mar-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
06-Feb-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
22-Jan-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Dec-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
01-Oct-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Sep-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
08-Jul-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
25-Apr-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
09-Mar-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
19-Jan-2024
Lok Adalat
District Munsif, Mettur
-
20-Dec-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
26-Sep-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
26-Jul-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
21-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 123/2023
Summary The petition filed under the CPC Order 39 Rules 1, 2 and Section 151 seeking a permanent injunction against the respondents regarding disputed agricultural land (0.22 cents in survey no. 311/4A4) in Madura district is dismissed without costs. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, prove irreparable loss, or present sufficient documentary evidence to support the claims. Additionally, the court determined that the matter involves complex property disputes and shared ownership issues that cannot be adequately determined through a temporary injunction application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts