K.P.Srinivasan vs Kandasamy and 2 others Advocate - SIVAPRAKASHAM. S. — 115/2020
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section O7R1to6. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed without cost on 27th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170001512020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
218/2020
Filing Date
28-08-2020
Registration No
115/2020
Registration Date
31-08-2020
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.P.Srinivasan
Adv. P.Siddhan
Respondent(s)
Kandasamy and 2 others Advocate - SIVAPRAKASHAM. S.
Vijaya Lakshmi
Adv. SIVAPRAKASHAM. S.
Prabakaran
Adv. SIVAPRAKASHAM. S.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 04-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 24-02-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Munsif of Mettur granted a permanent injunction in favor of plaintiff K.P. Srinivasan, restraining defendants Vijaya Lakshmi and Prabakaran from disturbing the plaintiff's possession of his property (0.58¾ cents in Survey no. 489/7C, Vanavasi Village) and a Vinayakar temple shed therein. The court accepted the plaintiff's evidence of ownership through a registered gift deed dated 29.12.2011 and rejected the defendants' unsubstantiated written statement, as they provided no evidence despite being set ex-parte; the court noted that pleadings alone cannot serve as proof without supporting evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The District Munsif of Mettur granted a permanent injunction in favor of plaintiff K.P. Srinivasan, restraining defendants Vijaya Lakshmi and Prabakaran from disturbing the plaintiff's possession of his property (0.58¾ cents in Survey no. 489/7C, Vanavasi Village) and a Vinayakar temple shed therein. The court accepted the plaintiff's evidence of ownership through a registered gift deed dated 29.12.2011 and rejected the defendants' unsubstantiated written statement, as they provided no evidence despite being set ex-parte; the court noted that pleadings alone cannot serve as proof without supporting evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts