K.P.Srinivasan vs Kandasamy and 2 others Advocate - SIVAPRAKASHAM. S. — 115/2020

Case under Suits Valuation Act Section O7R1to6. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed without cost on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA170001512020

Filing Number

218/2020

Filing Date

28-Aug-2020

Registration No

115/2020

Registration Date

31-Aug-2020

Court

District Munisf Court, Mettur

Judge

2-District Munsif, Mettur

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed without cost

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Suits Valuation Act Section O7R1to6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.P.Srinivasan

    Adv. P.Siddhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kandasamy and 2 others Advocate - SIVAPRAKASHAM. S.

  2. 2.Vijaya Lakshmi

    Adv. SIVAPRAKASHAM. S.

  3. 3.Prabakaran

    Adv. SIVAPRAKASHAM. S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The District Munsif of Mettur granted a permanent injunction in favor of plaintiff K.P. Srinivasan, restraining defendants Vijaya Lakshmi and Prabakaran from disturbing the plaintiff's possession of his property (0.58¾ cents in Survey no. 489/7C, Vanavasi Village) and a Vinayakar temple shed therein. The court accepted the plaintiff's evidence of ownership through a registered gift deed dated 29.12.2011 and rejected the defendants' unsubstantiated written statement, as they provided no evidence despite being set ex-parte; the court noted that pleadings alone cannot serve as proof without supporting evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif, Mettur

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  9. 07-Feb-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif, Mettur

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif, Mettur

  11. 26-Nov-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif, Mettur

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    District Munsif, Mettur

  13. 07-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif, Mettur

  14. 08-Sep-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  15. 21-Aug-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  16. 29-Jul-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  17. 08-Jul-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  18. 20-Jun-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  19. 04-Jun-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  20. 03-Apr-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  21. 20-Feb-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  22. 09-Jan-2025

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  23. 26-Nov-2024

    Steps

    District Munsif, Mettur

  24. 03-Oct-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  25. 21-Aug-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  26. 03-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  27. 16-Apr-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  28. 16-Apr-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  29. 05-Apr-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  30. 05-Apr-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  31. 06-Mar-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  32. 10-Jan-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  33. 30-Oct-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  34. 14-Aug-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  35. 06-Jul-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  36. 14-Jun-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif, Mettur

  37. 16-Mar-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  38. 25-Jan-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  39. 18-Nov-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  40. 22-Sep-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif, Mettur

  41. 16-Aug-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  42. 04-Jul-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  43. 20-Jun-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  44. 06-Apr-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  45. 18-Feb-2022

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  46. 09-Dec-2021

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  47. 30-Nov-2021

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  48. 19-Nov-2021

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif, Mettur

  49. 22-Sep-2021

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif, Mettur

  50. 11-Sep-2021

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif, Mettur

  51. 11-Aug-2021

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif, Mettur

  52. 28-Jun-2021

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  53. 10-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  54. 25-Mar-2021

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif, Mettur

  55. 26-Feb-2021

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  56. 23-Dec-2020

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  57. 29-Oct-2020

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Mettur

  58. 29-Sep-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 28-Aug-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 115/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Munsif of Mettur granted a permanent injunction in favor of plaintiff K.P. Srinivasan, restraining defendants Vijaya Lakshmi and Prabakaran from disturbing the plaintiff's possession of his property (0.58¾ cents in Survey no. 489/7C, Vanavasi Village) and a Vinayakar temple shed therein. The court accepted the plaintiff's evidence of ownership through a registered gift deed dated 29.12.2011 and rejected the defendants' unsubstantiated written statement, as they provided no evidence despite being set ex-parte; the court noted that pleadings alone cannot serve as proof without supporting evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case