Raji vs Kayathri and 1 another Advocate - L.GANAPATHY SUBRAMANIAN — 110/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1-6. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170001312021
Filing Number
164/2021
Filing Date
05-Aug-2021
Registration No
110/2021
Registration Date
05-Aug-2021
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raji
Adv. SenthilKumar S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kayathri and 1 another Advocate - L.GANAPATHY SUBRAMANIAN
-
2.Gowthamapriya
Adv. L.GANAPATHY SUBRAMANIAN
Case History
-
07-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Feb-2026
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
22-Jan-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Dec-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Dec-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
19-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
25-Oct-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
24-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
09-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
16-Jun-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
17-Mar-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Feb-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
27-Jan-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
30-Oct-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Sep-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
23-Jul-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Jun-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
27-Mar-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
02-Jan-2024
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Oct-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
24-Aug-2023
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The District Civil Court, Madurai dismissed the petition for a permanent injunction filed by the petitioner against the respondents regarding a property dispute. The court held that a temporary/interlocutory injunction petition is not the appropriate forum for a full trial on merits and ruled that substantive issues—including the petitioner's lawful possession rights over the shared property and alleged interference by respondents—should be decided during the main case proceedings, not at this preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Aug-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
19-Jul-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Jul-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
15-Jun-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
28-Mar-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
23-Jan-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Dec-2022
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
28-Sep-2022
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
13-Aug-2022
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
12-Aug-2022
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Jul-2022
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Jun-2022
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
11-Mar-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
25-Feb-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
07-Jan-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
09-Dec-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
08-Nov-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
07-Oct-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
07-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 110/2021
Summary The District Civil Court, Madurai dismissed the petition for a permanent injunction filed by the petitioner against the respondents regarding a property dispute. The court held that a temporary/interlocutory injunction petition is not the appropriate forum for a full trial on merits and ruled that substantive issues—including the petitioner's lawful possession rights over the shared property and alleged interference by respondents—should be decided during the main case proceedings, not at this preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts