Kannaiyan vs Sagunthala and 2 other Advocate - L.GANAPATHY SUBRAMANIAN — 69/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1-6. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170000862021
Filing Number
115/2021
Filing Date
26-Apr-2021
Registration No
69/2021
Registration Date
26-Apr-2021
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kannaiyan
Adv. SWAMYNATHAN. K. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sagunthala and 2 other Advocate - L.GANAPATHY SUBRAMANIAN
-
2.Kalaiyarasi
Adv. L.GANAPATHY SUBRAMANIAN
-
3.Ragupathi
Adv. L.GANAPATHY SUBRAMANIAN
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Mar-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
29-Jan-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
12-Dec-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The petition for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner was allowed. The court appointed Advocate Mr. Ranjith to inspect and measure the suit properties, note their physical features, and file a detailed report with sketches by 29.01.2026. The court rejected the respondents' objection regarding delay in filing, holding that delay alone is not grounds for dismissal when warranted by facts and circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Dec-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Dec-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
27-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
22-Oct-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
22-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
25-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
14-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
16-Apr-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
13-Mar-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
08-Jan-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Dec-2024
Part Heard
District Munsif, Mettur
-
29-Oct-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
29-Oct-2024
Part Heard
District Munsif, Mettur
-
19-Sep-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
19-Sep-2024
Part Heard
District Munsif, Mettur
-
20-Aug-2024
Part Heard
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Jul-2024
Part Heard
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Jun-2024
Part Heard
District Munsif, Mettur
-
27-Mar-2024
Part Heard
District Munsif, Mettur
-
21-Feb-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
21-Feb-2024
Part Heard
District Munsif, Mettur
-
08-Jan-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
08-Jan-2024
For further Proceedings
District Munsif, Mettur
-
06-Dec-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Nov-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
13-Sep-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
26-Jul-2023
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
26-Jul-2023
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Jul-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Jul-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
19-Jun-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
06-Apr-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
20-Mar-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
23-Jan-2023
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
01-Nov-2022
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
23-Sep-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
16-Aug-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
12-Jul-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
17-Jun-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
21-Mar-2022
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Jan-2022
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
02-Nov-2021
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Oct-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Sep-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Aug-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
25-Jun-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Apr-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 69/2021
Summary: The petition for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner was allowed. The court appointed Advocate Mr. Ranjith to inspect and measure the suit properties, note their physical features, and file a detailed report with sketches by 29.01.2026. The court rejected the respondents' objection regarding delay in filing, holding that delay alone is not grounds for dismissal when warranted by facts and circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts