Gangadharan and 3 others vs Pandurangan and another one Advocate - Senthilkumar S — 55/2020
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7R1to6. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170000782020
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
111/2020
Filing Date
25-06-2020
Registration No
55/2020
Registration Date
30-06-2020
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gangadharan and 3 others
Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. M. P.
Arul kumar
Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. M. P.
Manimegalai
Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. M. P.
Respondent(s)
Pandurangan and another one Advocate - Senthilkumar S
Seerangan
Adv. Given up
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Amendment | |
| 02-04-2026 | Amendment | |
| 10-03-2026 | Amendment | |
| 11-02-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 23-01-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The petition filed by M. Yasodha, M. Somasundaram, and M. Ramachandran is allowed without costs. The court orders that the petitioners be impleaded as defendants 3-5 in the original suit (O.S. 55/2020) filed against defendants 1-2 (Kanakatharan and Arulanandaar). The court found that the petitioners have a legitimate interest in the disputed joint Hindu family property and are necessary parties to the partition suit, as they are heirs of the deceased Moorthy and have rights over the property in dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The petition filed by M. Yasodha, M. Somasundaram, and M. Ramachandran is allowed without costs. The court orders that the petitioners be impleaded as defendants 3-5 in the original suit (O.S. 55/2020) filed against defendants 1-2 (Kanakatharan and Arulanandaar). The court found that the petitioners have a legitimate interest in the disputed joint Hindu family property and are necessary parties to the partition suit, as they are heirs of the deceased Moorthy and have rights over the property in dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts