Velu vs Madesn and 7others — 49/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o7R1-6. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA170000672022

IA Pending

Next Hearing

18th March 2026

Filing Number

102/2022

Filing Date

31-03-2022

Registration No

49/2022

Registration Date

31-03-2022

Court

District Munisf Court, Mettur

Judge

2-District Munsif, Mettur

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o7R1-6

Petitioner(s)

Velu

Adv. L.GANAPATHY SUBRAMANIAN

Respondent(s)

Madesn and 7others

Dhanam

Jayammal

Valarmathi

Selvi

Chinnammal

Sithaiayan

Perumayee

Adv. KOKILAVANI. K.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur

09-03-2026

IA Pending

05-03-2026

IA Pending

26-02-2026

IA Pending

16-02-2026

IA Pending

13-01-2026

IA Pending

Interim Orders

23-07-2025
Copy of Deposition

Summary This is a Tamil language civil case (OS No. 49/2022) from the District Court in Mettur dated 23.07.2025 involving a land property dispute. The court conducted cross-examination of witness PW.1 (Velu/Muthukavundar) regarding the 8th defendant's testimony. The court's order rejected the plaintiff's contentions and found the case was filed with mala fide intent to challenge the 8th defendant's legitimate land purchase. The court dismissed the case, ruling that the case must proceed afresh (retrial ordered) as it was improperly filed without including all parties who purchased portions of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Tamil language civil case (OS No. 49/2022) from the District Court in Mettur dated 23.07.2025 involving a land property dispute. The court conducted cross-examination of witness PW.1 (Velu/Muthukavundar) regarding the 8th defendant's testimony. The court's order rejected the plaintiff's contentions and found the case was filed with mala fide intent to challenge the 8th defendant's legitimate land purchase. The court dismissed the case, ruling that the case must proceed afresh (retrial ordered) as it was improperly filed without including all parties who purchased portions of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munisf Court, Mettur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case