Manickam vs Sekar and 2 others Advocate - SENTHILKUMAR. S.K — 200244/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27c. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSA170000662014
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
200244/2014
Filing Date
11-10-2014
Registration No
200244/2014
Registration Date
11-10-2014
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manickam
Adv. VINOTH D
Respondent(s)
Sekar and 2 others Advocate - SENTHILKUMAR. S.K
Govindhan
Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. S.K
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 26-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 17-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 16-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 22-01-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary The petition filed under the Civil Procedure Code (Order 26 Rule 9 and Section 151) for appointment of a Court Commissioner has been allowed. The court appointed a Court Commissioner (Advocate S. Santhilkumar) to inspect the property survey document bearing No. 200/3 dated 15.09.2003, ascertain whether the property was actually mortgaged as claimed, and submit a report with relevant maps by 06.12.2021. The Commissioner's fee was fixed at Rs. 5,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The petition filed under the Civil Procedure Code (Order 26 Rule 9 and Section 151) for appointment of a Court Commissioner has been allowed. The court appointed a Court Commissioner (Advocate S. Santhilkumar) to inspect the property survey document bearing No. 200/3 dated 15.09.2003, ascertain whether the property was actually mortgaged as claimed, and submit a report with relevant maps by 06.12.2021. The Commissioner's fee was fixed at Rs. 5,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts