Gopal vs Kavery and 6 others Advocate - STALIN RAJA L — 42/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1-6. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170000552021
Filing Number
79/2021
Filing Date
11-Mar-2021
Registration No
42/2021
Registration Date
16-Mar-2021
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gopal
Adv. Ramakrishnan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kavery and 6 others Advocate - STALIN RAJA L
-
2.Balu
Adv. STALIN RAJA L
-
3.Venkatasalam
-
4.Murugesan
Adv. STALIN RAJA L
-
5.Mathayan
-
6.Ramesh
Adv. STALIN RAJA L
-
7.Mayilsamy
Adv. STALIN RAJA L
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
16-Feb-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
05-Feb-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
16-Dec-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
27-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
22-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
21-Aug-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
24-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
17-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
02-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Mar-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
23-Jan-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
23-Jan-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The District Civil Court in Mettur dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner seeking a temporary injunction against seven defendants regarding a property dispute. The court found that the petitioner failed to prove his exclusive possession of the disputed land and that the defendants' actions causing interference were not substantiated, noting that a mini-trial at the interim injunction stage was inappropriate. The petition was dismissed without granting the temporary injunction relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Jan-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Mettur
-
16-Dec-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
14-Nov-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
16-Oct-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Sep-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
20-Aug-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
03-Jul-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
18-Jun-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
15-Apr-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Mar-2024
Issues
District Munsif, Mettur
-
09-Jan-2024
Appearance
District Munsif, Mettur
-
29-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif, Mettur
-
16-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif, Mettur
-
11-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif, Mettur
-
20-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
District Munsif, Mettur
-
14-Jun-2023
Additional Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
14-Mar-2023
Batta
District Munsif, Mettur
-
30-Jan-2023
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
06-Jan-2023
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
13-Dec-2022
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
02-Dec-2022
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
17-Nov-2022
Amendment
District Munsif, Mettur
-
08-Nov-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Sep-2022
IA Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Aug-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
04-Jul-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
10-Jun-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Mettur
-
29-Apr-2022
Steps
District Munsif, Mettur
-
11-Feb-2022
Steps
District Munsif, Mettur
-
21-Dec-2021
Steps
District Munsif, Mettur
-
22-Nov-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
27-Oct-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif, Mettur
-
20-Sep-2021
Batta
District Munsif, Mettur
-
12-Jul-2021
Await Notice
District Munsif, Mettur
-
17-Jun-2021
Await Notice
District Munsif, Mettur
-
15-Apr-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 42/2021
The District Civil Court in Mettur dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner seeking a temporary injunction against seven defendants regarding a property dispute. The court found that the petitioner failed to prove his exclusive possession of the disputed land and that the defendants' actions causing interference were not substantiated, noting that a mini-trial at the interim injunction stage was inappropriate. The petition was dismissed without granting the temporary injunction relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts