S.Rajagopal and 1 other vs P.Ponnusamy and 6 others Advocate - SENTHILKUMAR. S.K — 200131/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSA170000322016
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
200131/2016
Filing Date
06-07-2016
Registration No
200131/2016
Registration Date
06-07-2016
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.Rajagopal and 1 other
Adv. Tr.P.Gopinath
S.sivanandham
Adv. GOPINATH. P.
Respondent(s)
P.Ponnusamy and 6 others Advocate - SENTHILKUMAR. S.K
P.Sellappan
Adv. GURUSAMY.R
P.Ramasamy
Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. S.K
P.Manickam
Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. S.K
P.Sivaperumal
Adv. GURUSAMY.R
P.Eswari
Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. S.K
P.Sivaraj
Adv. SENTHILKUMAR. S.K
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur
Trial
Trial
Written Statement
Additional Written Statement
Additional Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Trial |
| 17-02-2026 | Trial |
| 09-02-2026 | Written Statement |
| 09-01-2026 | Additional Written Statement |
| 03-12-2025 | Additional Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary The District Civil Court at Metur allowed the petition (I.M.No.04/2023) filed under Civil Procedure Code Section 151 and Rule 10(2). The court ordered that the petitioner be added as the 8th defendant in the original suit (A.V.No.131/2016), finding that the petitioner has necessary interest and locus standi in the case relating to a Devasthanam (temple endowment) property and that joining the petitioner as a defendant would serve the ends of justice and provide a complete remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Civil Court at Metur allowed the petition (I.M.No.04/2023) filed under Civil Procedure Code Section 151 and Rule 10(2). The court ordered that the petitioner be added as the 8th defendant in the original suit (A.V.No.131/2016), finding that the petitioner has necessary interest and locus standi in the case relating to a Devasthanam (temple endowment) property and that joining the petitioner as a defendant would serve the ends of justice and provide a complete remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts