PALANI vs BALRAJ and 9 others — 25/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER7RULE1TO6. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA170000282025
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
28-01-2025
Filing Number
33/2025
Filing Date
29-01-2025
Registration No
25/2025
Registration Date
29-01-2025
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PALANI
Adv. Gopinath P
Respondent(s)
BALRAJ and 9 others
SIVANANDAM
VELUSAMY
RATHANAVEL
MALLIKA
SAKTHIVEL
SANTHIYA
PALANISAMY
THAMARAI ALAIS SUNDARAM
CHINNATHAYEE
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 06-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 24-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 09-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 03-02-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Munsif Court, Mettur, allowed the petition and granted a temporary injunction in favor of Mr. Palani (plaintiff). The court restrained the ten respondents/defendants and their agents from interfering with Palani's peaceful possession of the suit property through illegal trespass or any other means until the original suit is disposed of. The court found that Palani established a prima facie case through documented evidence (sale deed dated 14.10.2019, patta transfer order, and encumbrance certificate), while the respondents failed to substantiate their counter-claims with any material evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Munsif Court, Mettur, allowed the petition and granted a temporary injunction in favor of Mr. Palani (plaintiff). The court restrained the ten respondents/defendants and their agents from interfering with Palani's peaceful possession of the suit property through illegal trespass or any other means until the original suit is disposed of. The court found that Palani established a prima facie case through documented evidence (sale deed dated 14.10.2019, patta transfer order, and encumbrance certificate), while the respondents failed to substantiate their counter-claims with any material evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts