Arulkumar and 2 others vs Vellaiammal and 4 others — 200122/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27c. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSA170000132015
Next Hearing
12th March 2026
Filing Number
200122/2015
Filing Date
29-04-2015
Registration No
200122/2015
Registration Date
01-06-2015
Court
District Munisf Court, Mettur
Judge
2-District Munsif, Mettur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arulkumar and 2 others
Adv. G.Malathi
Kavitha
Adv. G.Malathi
Indirani
Adv. R.P.Annamalai
Respondent(s)
Vellaiammal and 4 others
Periyagounder (unsound mind)(died)
Adv. R.P.Annamalai
Perumayee
Chandrasekar @ Chandrasekaran
Adv. R.P.Annamalai
Gunasekaran
Adv. R.P.Annamalai
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Mettur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a court record from the District Civil Court, Mettur (dated 13.02.2026) for OS Nos. 27/2015 and 122/2015, containing the cross-examination testimony of witness DW.5. The proceeding documents the witness's sworn statement regarding property division matters, including testimony about land parcels (approximately 1 acre), the death of Mohan Viraj (died 1992), and disputes concerning a will and property boundaries. No final order is issued in this document; it only records the witness examination transcript. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a court record from the District Civil Court, Mettur (dated 13.02.2026) for OS Nos. 27/2015 and 122/2015, containing the cross-examination testimony of witness DW.5. The proceeding documents the witness's sworn statement regarding property division matters, including testimony about land parcels (approximately 1 acre), the death of Mohan Viraj (died 1992), and disputes concerning a will and property boundaries. No final order is issued in this document; it only records the witness examination transcript. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts