Canara Bank,kolathur Represened By Its Branch Manager And Power Of Attorney Agent vs Sindhuja — 466/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1to6andsec-34. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA160010792023

Judgement

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

e-Filing Number

26-11-2023

Filing Number

1140/2023

Filing Date

28-11-2023

Registration No

466/2023

Registration Date

28-11-2023

Court

Sub Court, Mettur

Judge

1-Sub Judge, Mettur

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1to6andsec-34

Petitioner(s)

Canara Bank,kolathur Represened By Its Branch Manager And Power Of Attorney Agent

Adv. UMAMAHESWARI G

Respondent(s)

Sindhuja

Raja

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge, Mettur

05-03-2026

Judgement

13-01-2026

Arguments

26-11-2025

Arguments

25-10-2025

Arguments

24-09-2025

Arguments

Interim Orders

27-11-2024
Copy of Deposition

Summary In OS No. 466/2023 before the Subordinate Judge, Mettur, the deposition of PW1 (witness Saravanan) was recorded on 27.11.2024. The witness, employed as a bank employee, affirmed his affidavit-in-chief containing relevant facts and submitted five documentary exhibits including a loan application, permission letter, educational loan agreement, loan outstanding acknowledgment letter, and account statement dated from 2015-2023. No cross-examination was conducted, and the court accepted the witness's testimony and documents into record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In OS No. 466/2023 before the Subordinate Judge, Mettur, the deposition of PW1 (witness Saravanan) was recorded on 27.11.2024. The witness, employed as a bank employee, affirmed his affidavit-in-chief containing relevant facts and submitted five documentary exhibits including a loan application, permission letter, educational loan agreement, loan outstanding acknowledgment letter, and account statement dated from 2015-2023. No cross-examination was conducted, and the court accepted the witness's testimony and documents into record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Sub Court, Mettur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case