State Bank of India,Nangavalli branch, Repby Authorised Officer,The Manager vs K.Kandasamy — 215/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section o7r1to6. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 08th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA160005032024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

529/2024

Filing Date

26-07-2024

Registration No

215/2024

Registration Date

14-08-2024

Court

Sub Court, Mettur

Judge

1-Sub Judge, Mettur

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed with cost

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section o7r1to6

Petitioner(s)

State Bank of India,Nangavalli branch, Repby Authorised Officer,The Manager

Adv. M.Vijayakumar

Respondent(s)

K.Kandasamy

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub Judge, Mettur

08-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

Judgement

10-03-2026

Judgement

13-01-2026

Arguments

26-11-2025

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The Subordinate Court at Mettur decreed in favor of State Bank of India, holding that defendant K. Kandasamy must repay Rs. 1,12,034 (the outstanding loan amount under the KCC scheme) with 9% per annum interest from the suit date until decree, and 6% per annum thereafter until full payment. The court found the plaintiff proved its case through credible documentary evidence and witness testimony, while the defendant's failure to contest the case (exparte proceedings) strengthened the plaintiff's position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Subordinate Court at Mettur decreed in favor of State Bank of India, holding that defendant K. Kandasamy must repay Rs. 1,12,034 (the outstanding loan amount under the KCC scheme) with 9% per annum interest from the suit date until decree, and 6% per annum thereafter until full payment. The court found the plaintiff proved its case through credible documentary evidence and witness testimony, while the defendant's failure to contest the case (exparte proceedings) strengthened the plaintiff's position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Mettur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case