State Bank of India,Nangavalli branch, Repby Authorised Officer,The Manager vs K.Kandasamy — 215/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section o7r1to6. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 08th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA160005032024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
529/2024
Filing Date
26-07-2024
Registration No
215/2024
Registration Date
14-08-2024
Court
Sub Court, Mettur
Judge
1-Sub Judge, Mettur
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank of India,Nangavalli branch, Repby Authorised Officer,The Manager
Adv. M.Vijayakumar
Respondent(s)
K.Kandasamy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge, Mettur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 13-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 26-11-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Subordinate Court at Mettur decreed in favor of State Bank of India, holding that defendant K. Kandasamy must repay Rs. 1,12,034 (the outstanding loan amount under the KCC scheme) with 9% per annum interest from the suit date until decree, and 6% per annum thereafter until full payment. The court found the plaintiff proved its case through credible documentary evidence and witness testimony, while the defendant's failure to contest the case (exparte proceedings) strengthened the plaintiff's position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Subordinate Court at Mettur decreed in favor of State Bank of India, holding that defendant K. Kandasamy must repay Rs. 1,12,034 (the outstanding loan amount under the KCC scheme) with 9% per annum interest from the suit date until decree, and 6% per annum thereafter until full payment. The court found the plaintiff proved its case through credible documentary evidence and witness testimony, while the defendant's failure to contest the case (exparte proceedings) strengthened the plaintiff's position. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts