Menagapriya vs Yuvaraj alias Dinesh — 48/2025

Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia)(ib). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

Orders Next hearing 23-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNSA160002242025

Filing Number

213/2025

Filing Date

11-Mar-2025

Registration No

48/2025

Registration Date

18-Mar-2025

Court

Sub Court, Mettur

Judge

1-Sub Judge, Mettur

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia)(ib)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Menagapriya

    Adv. AKILA S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yuvaraj alias Dinesh

Case History

  1. 23-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge, Mettur

  3. 12-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Summary: The Court of the Subordinate Judge, Mettur recorded the deposition of PW 1 (witness) on 12.02.2026 in case HMOP 48/2025. The witness affirmed her statement under the Oaths Act 1969, confirmed the accuracy of her written testimony, and produced supporting documents including newspaper clippings and Aadhaar card copies as evidence for her case. The court accepted and authenticated her testimony and marked the documents as exhibits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Mettur

  5. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Mettur

  6. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Sub Judge, Mettur

  7. 14-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Mettur

  8. 11-Aug-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Mettur

  9. 03-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Mettur

  10. 17-Apr-2025

    Service Pending-Notice

    Sub Judge, Mettur

  11. 18-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 11-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Court of the Subordinate Judge, Mettur recorded the deposition of PW 1 (witness) on 12.02.2026 in case HMOP 48/2025. The witness affirmed her statement under the Oaths Act 1969, confirmed the accuracy of her written testimony, and produced supporting documents including newspaper clippings and Aadhaar card copies as evidence for her case. The court accepted and authenticated her testimony and marked the documents as exhibits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case