The Inspector of Police THAMMAMPATTY vs KUMAR — 2000/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4-A. Disposed: Uncontested--Judgement on admission on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNSA140063532025

e-Filing Number

16-12-2025

Filing Number

6353/2025

Filing Date

16-Dec-2025

Registration No

2000/2025

Registration Date

19-Dec-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate, Attur

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Judgement on admission

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police THAMMAMPATTY

    Adv. Si of Police

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judicial/Revenue proceedings.View PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Attur found the respondent Kumar guilty under Section 4(A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act and imposed a fine of Rs. 1,000 with IDSI (Imprisonment in Default of fine) for one week. The court allowed both the advance hearing petition and admission petition filed in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2000/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Attur found the respondent Kumar guilty under Section 4(A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act and imposed a fine of Rs. 1,000 with IDSI (Imprisonment in Default of fine) for one week. The court allowed both the advance hearing petition and admission petition filed in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case