The Inspector of Police KARUMANDURAI vs VANKATESAN — 1682/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th March 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNSA140058432025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

20-11-2025

Filing Number

5843/2025

Filing Date

20-11-2025

Registration No

1682/2025

Registration Date

06-12-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate, Attur

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C)
Mp/2/2026 Classification : Recall Petition Section VANKATESANThe Inspector of Police KARUMANDURAI

Petitioner(s)

The Inspector of Police KARUMANDURAI

Adv. SI OF POLICE KARUMANDURAI PS

Respondent(s)

VANKATESAN

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur

06-03-2026

Disposed

17-02-2026

Judgement

16-02-2026

Service Pending-Warrant

07-02-2026

Service Pending-Warrant

06-02-2026

Questioning

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Attur acquitted Venkatesan of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical procedural failures: the seized liquor bottles were destroyed without proper documentation, no independent witnesses were examined, and required investigation protocols under TNP Act Section 32 were not followed. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt, the accused was discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Attur acquitted Venkatesan of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court identified critical procedural failures: the seized liquor bottles were destroyed without proper documentation, no independent witnesses were examined, and required investigation protocols under TNP Act Section 32 were not followed. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt, the accused was discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate, Attur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case