The Inspector of Police GANGAVALLI vs ravi — 1589/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1) (c). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSA140056532025
e-Filing Number
08-11-2025
Filing Number
5653/2025
Filing Date
10-11-2025
Registration No
1589/2025
Registration Date
17-11-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate, Attur
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Inspector of Police GANGAVALLI
Adv. SI OF POLICE GENGAVALLI PS
Respondent(s)
ravi
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 03-02-2026 | Questioning |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Athoor (Tamil Nadu) acquitted Ravi, a 56-year-old accused charged under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing 12 bottles of Copper Brandy (~180 ML) without government permission. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt due to critical procedural lapses: the seized alcohol was destroyed without proper documentation, no independent witnesses were presented, no measurement records or site plans were maintained, and the evidence chain was compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Athoor (Tamil Nadu) acquitted Ravi, a 56-year-old accused charged under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing 12 bottles of Copper Brandy (~180 ML) without government permission. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt due to critical procedural lapses: the seized alcohol was destroyed without proper documentation, no independent witnesses were presented, no measurement records or site plans were maintained, and the evidence chain was compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts