PRIYANKA vs PRABHAKARAN — 1374/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 20(4). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNSA140054192025
e-Filing Number
24-10-2025
Filing Number
5419/2025
Filing Date
25-Oct-2025
Registration No
1374/2025
Registration Date
28-Oct-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate, Attur
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRIYANKA
Adv. XAVIER MARIYAPILLAI
-
2.MINOR ABIJITH
Adv. XAVIER MARIYAPILLAI
-
3.MINOR AKSHAYA
Adv. XAVIER MARIYAPILLAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRABHAKARAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy of Judicial/Revenue proceedings.View PDF
The Judicial Magistrate No. II at Attur allowed the petition. However, the judgment document provided contains only the order header and conclusion without substantive reasoning, detailed facts, or specific relief granted, making a complete analysis impossible from the available text. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
09-Apr-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
17-Mar-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
10-Mar-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
18-Feb-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
10-Jan-2026
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
24-Dec-2025
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
06-Dec-2025
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
27-Nov-2025
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
28-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1374/2025
The Judicial Magistrate No. II at Attur allowed the petition. However, the judgment document provided contains only the order header and conclusion without substantive reasoning, detailed facts, or specific relief granted, making a complete analysis impossible from the available text. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts