SI of police Attur Town Police vs Madhu — 291/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 324, 506(2). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSA140044972023
Filing Number
4497/2023
Filing Date
21-Jul-2023
Registration No
291/2023
Registration Date
21-Jul-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate, Attur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SI of police Attur Town Police
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Madhu
Case History
-
20-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
10-Mar-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
10-Feb-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
19-Jan-2026
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
17-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
24-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
27-Oct-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
30-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
09-Sep-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
18-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
01-Aug-2025
Copy of Judicial/Revenue proceedings.View PDF
-
01-Aug-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary of Court Order Case: CC. 291/2023, Judicial Magistrate No.1, Attur Outcome: Witness depositions recorded on 01.08.2025. Three prosecution witnesses (PW1, PW2, PW3) testified regarding an assault incident on 27.02.2023 at 07:30 AM involving a dispute over water collection. The accused allegedly struck the victim (Ramasamy, age 70) with a stick, causing head injuries requiring hospitalization and medical treatment. All witness statements were recorded in open court under the Oaths Act, 1969, and admitted as correct; no cross-examination by the defence was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
02-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
04-Jun-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
16-May-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
15-Apr-2025
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
25-Feb-2025
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
20-Jan-2025
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
26-Dec-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
19-Nov-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
16-Oct-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
24-Sep-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
02-Sep-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
06-Aug-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
10-Jul-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
06-Jul-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
19-Jun-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
22-May-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
26-Apr-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
19-Apr-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
02-Mar-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
14-Feb-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
12-Jan-2024
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
22-Dec-2023
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
07-Dec-2023
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
27-Nov-2023
Await Notice
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
04-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
07-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
26-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate - I, Attur
-
22-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 291/2023
Summary of Court Order Case: CC. 291/2023, Judicial Magistrate No.1, Attur Outcome: Witness depositions recorded on 01.08.2025. Three prosecution witnesses (PW1, PW2, PW3) testified regarding an assault incident on 27.02.2023 at 07:30 AM involving a dispute over water collection. The accused allegedly struck the victim (Ramasamy, age 70) with a stick, causing head injuries requiring hospitalization and medical treatment. All witness statements were recorded in open court under the Oaths Act, 1969, and admitted as correct; no cross-examination by the defence was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts