Malliyakarai PS vs Manicakm — 249/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 323, 324. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 20th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSA140010042022
Filing Number
999/2022
Filing Date
20-Apr-2022
Registration No
249/2022
Registration Date
22-Apr-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate, Attur
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Malliyakarai PS (Police Station)
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manicakm
-
2.Manoj kumar
Case History
-
20-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Apr-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
10-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
10-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
23-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
26-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
24-Nov-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
29-Oct-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
23-Sep-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
18-Aug-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
29-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
10-Jul-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
05-Jun-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
12-May-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
23-Apr-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
07-Apr-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
18-Feb-2025
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
17-Dec-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
15-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
11-Sep-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary Case No. CC.249/2022 | Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Attur Witness PW-5 (LW-5) testified on 11.09.2024 regarding events of 06.03.2022 and 08.03.2022. The court found the witness's testimony contradicted statements made during police investigation (Section 161 CrPC), making him a hostile witness. Cross-examination by the prosecution was permitted to test the credibility and reliability of his evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
24-Aug-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
07-Aug-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
09-Jul-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
25-Jun-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
07-Jun-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
07-Jun-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
16-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
07-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
23-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
17-Nov-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
11-Oct-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
11-Aug-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
27-Jun-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
26-Apr-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
03-Mar-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
20-Jan-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
08-Nov-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
27-Sep-2022
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
20-Sep-2022
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
22-Aug-2022
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
19-Jul-2022
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
22-Jun-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
25-May-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
23-Apr-2022
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
-
22-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 249/2022
Case Summary Case No. CC.249/2022 | Judicial Magistrate Court No. II, Attur Witness PW-5 (LW-5) testified on 11.09.2024 regarding events of 06.03.2022 and 08.03.2022. The court found the witness's testimony contradicted statements made during police investigation (Section 161 CrPC), making him a hostile witness. Cross-examination by the prosecution was permitted to test the credibility and reliability of his evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts