The Inspector of Police GANGAVALLI vs LATHA — 61/2026

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1) (C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSA140002312026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

231/2026

Filing Date

07-01-2026

Registration No

61/2026

Registration Date

12-01-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate, Attur

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Acts & Sections

TN PROHIBITION ACT Section 4(1) (C)

Petitioner(s)

The Inspector of Police GANGAVALLI

Adv. SI OF POLICE GENGAVALLI PS

Respondent(s)

LATHA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur

02-04-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Questioning

10-03-2026

Trial

23-02-2026

Trial

13-02-2026

Questioning

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Attur acquitted the accused, Latha (39), of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing 180 ML of Express Brandy bottles for sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing inadequate evidence including lack of proper measurement of confiscated bottles, absence of independent witnesses, missing scene inspection reports, and procedural irregularities in evidence handling. Consequently, the accused was discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Attur acquitted the accused, Latha (39), of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing 180 ML of Express Brandy bottles for sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing inadequate evidence including lack of proper measurement of confiscated bottles, absence of independent witnesses, missing scene inspection reports, and procedural irregularities in evidence handling. Consequently, the accused was discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate, Attur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case