The Inspector of Police GANGAVALLI vs LATHA — 61/2026
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1) (C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNSA140002312026
e-Filing Number
07-01-2026
Filing Number
231/2026
Filing Date
07-01-2026
Registration No
61/2026
Registration Date
12-01-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate, Attur
Judge
4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Inspector of Police GANGAVALLI
Adv. SI OF POLICE GENGAVALLI PS
Respondent(s)
LATHA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Attur
Disposed
Questioning
Trial
Trial
Questioning
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 23-02-2026 | Trial | |
| 13-02-2026 | Questioning |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Attur acquitted the accused, Latha (39), of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing 180 ML of Express Brandy bottles for sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing inadequate evidence including lack of proper measurement of confiscated bottles, absence of independent witnesses, missing scene inspection reports, and procedural irregularities in evidence handling. Consequently, the accused was discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Attur acquitted the accused, Latha (39), of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing 180 ML of Express Brandy bottles for sale. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, citing inadequate evidence including lack of proper measurement of confiscated bottles, absence of independent witnesses, missing scene inspection reports, and procedural irregularities in evidence handling. Consequently, the accused was discharged under Section 271(1) BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts