STATE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, VEERAGANUR vs P. SAMPOORANAM Advocate - Exparte — 349/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Or.7R1to6. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 10th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA130003842022
Filing Number
671/2022
Filing Date
23-Dec-2022
Registration No
349/2022
Registration Date
23-Dec-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Attur
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif, Attur
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed with cost
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, VEERAGANUR
Adv. MUTHUSAMY.N
Respondent(s)
-
1.P. SAMPOORANAM Advocate - Exparte
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Principal District Munsif Court, Attur, decreed in favor of State Bank of India against defendant P. Sampooranam for recovery of Rs. 78,680.40 (outstanding loan amount) with 6% per annum interest from the suit filing date until realization, plus court costs. The court found the defendant defaulted on a Rs. 50,000 Kissan Credit Cash Crop loan sanctioned in 2018, and since the defendant failed to appear or contest the claim, the plaintiff's documentary evidence proved the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
04-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
04-Feb-2026
Arguments
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
08-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
15-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
13-Nov-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
17-Oct-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
19-Aug-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
28-Jul-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
05-Jun-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
15-Apr-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
28-Feb-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
14-Dec-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
22-Nov-2024
Lok Adalat
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
12-Nov-2024
Lok Adalat
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
15-Oct-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
01-Oct-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
01-Oct-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
23-Sep-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
28-Aug-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
25-Jul-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
15-Jun-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
19-Apr-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
21-Feb-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
05-Jan-2024
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
24-Nov-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
30-Oct-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
15-Sep-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
07-Aug-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
01-Jul-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
12-Jun-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
16-Mar-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
01-Mar-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
24-Jan-2023
Ex-Parte Evidence
Principal District Munsif, Attur
-
23-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 349/2022
Summary The Principal District Munsif Court, Attur, decreed in favor of State Bank of India against defendant P. Sampooranam for recovery of Rs. 78,680.40 (outstanding loan amount) with 6% per annum interest from the suit filing date until realization, plus court costs. The court found the defendant defaulted on a Rs. 50,000 Kissan Credit Cash Crop loan sanctioned in 2018, and since the defendant failed to appear or contest the claim, the plaintiff's documentary evidence proved the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts