DHANABAKKIYAM vs GANESAN AND ANOTHER Advocate - CHANDRASEKARAN. K. — 199/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O.7R.1-6. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA130002802020
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
526/2020
Filing Date
07-11-2020
Registration No
199/2020
Registration Date
07-11-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Attur
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif, Attur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHANABAKKIYAM
Adv. SUBBARAYAN R
Respondent(s)
GANESAN AND ANOTHER Advocate - CHANDRASEKARAN. K.
VIJAYALAKSHMI
Adv. CHANDRASEKARAN. K.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal District Munsif, Attur
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 09-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 08-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 06-12-2025 | Issue of Service |
| 06-11-2025 | Issue of Service |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 199/2020, Principal District Munsif Court, Attur (Tamil Nadu) Outcome: The suit for permanent injunction filed by plaintiff Dhanabakkiyam against defendants Ganesan and Vijayalakshmi was allowed. The court granted a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their heirs, and legal representatives from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful enjoyment and possession of the suit property. The defendants were ordered to pay the plaintiff damages amounting to Rs. 1,040.25 as litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 199/2020, Principal District Munsif Court, Attur (Tamil Nadu) Outcome: The suit for permanent injunction filed by plaintiff Dhanabakkiyam against defendants Ganesan and Vijayalakshmi was allowed. The court granted a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their heirs, and legal representatives from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful enjoyment and possession of the suit property. The defendants were ordered to pay the plaintiff damages amounting to Rs. 1,040.25 as litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts