CHINNASAMY UDAYAR AND 2 OTHERS vs MARUTHAMUTHU UDAYAR AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - SURESH. S. — 117/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section or.7r1to6. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA130001752019
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
301/2019
Filing Date
12-06-2019
Registration No
117/2019
Registration Date
14-06-2019
Court
District Munsif Court, Attur
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif, Attur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHINNASAMY UDAYAR AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. RAMESH.K
Sivappayee
Adv. RAMESH. K.
Raja
Respondent(s)
MARUTHAMUTHU UDAYAR AND 3 OTHERS Advocate - SURESH. S.
Mayakkannan
Adv. SURESH. S.
The District Collector, Salem
Adv. CHANDRASEKARAN. K.
The Tahsildar, Attur
Adv. CHANDRASEKARAN. K.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal District Munsif, Attur
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 13-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 20-01-2026 | Part Heard |
| 10-12-2025 | Part Heard |
| 14-11-2025 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary In O.S. No. 117/2019 before the Principal District Munsif, Attur, the deposition of PW-3 (third witness) was recorded on 09.09.2025 in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness affirmed the correctness of his examination-in-chief statement and identified Aadhaar Card as documentary evidence for the plaintiff's side. The deposition proceeded from 01:25 P.M. to 01:28 P.M. and was acknowledged as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In O.S. No. 117/2019 before the Principal District Munsif, Attur, the deposition of PW-3 (third witness) was recorded on 09.09.2025 in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The witness affirmed the correctness of his examination-in-chief statement and identified Aadhaar Card as documentary evidence for the plaintiff's side. The deposition proceeded from 01:25 P.M. to 01:28 P.M. and was acknowledged as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts