Krishnamoorthy vs Mancikam Advocate - ARUMUGAM R — 84/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s.Vii rul. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA130001322020
Filing Number
241/2020
Filing Date
01-Jul-2020
Registration No
84/2020
Registration Date
03-Jul-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Attur
Judge
3-Additional District Munsif, Attur
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat
Last updated 18-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Krishnamoorthy
Adv. KUMARAVEL. V.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mancikam Advocate - ARUMUGAM R
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
06-Mar-2026
Appearance
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
05-Feb-2026
Issue of Process
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
05-Feb-2026
Restored
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
05-Feb-2026
Appearance
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
12-Apr-2023
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The Additional District Munsif Court at Attur decreed the plaintiff's suit, declaring him the absolute owner of Item No. 1 (0.10 acres in survey no. 19/4) through adverse possession and granting permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of both suit properties. The court found that the plaintiff had sufficiently proved his long, continuous, open, and hostile possession against the defendant, who remained ex parte after failing to file a written statement despite receiving summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Apr-2023
Disposed
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
30-Mar-2023
Judgement
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
24-Mar-2023
Judgement
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
21-Mar-2023
Judgement
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
15-Mar-2023
Judgement
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
07-Mar-2023
Judgement
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
22-Feb-2023
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
22-Feb-2023
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
22-Feb-2023
Judgement
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
08-Feb-2023
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
23-Dec-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
14-Dec-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
02-Dec-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
09-Nov-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
19-Oct-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
11-Oct-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
26-Sep-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
22-Jul-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
12-Jul-2022
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
25-Apr-2022
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
25-Feb-2022
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
16-Dec-2021
Written Statement
Additional District Munsif, Attur
-
24-Nov-2021
Written Statement
-
27-Oct-2021
Written Statement
-
22-Sep-2021
Written Statement
-
12-Aug-2021
Written Statement
-
05-Jul-2021
Written Statement
-
29-Apr-2021
Written Statement
-
07-Apr-2021
Written Statement
-
02-Mar-2021
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
-
28-Jan-2021
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
-
27-Nov-2020
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
-
06-Oct-2020
Vakalat / Memo of Appearance
-
06-Aug-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jul-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 84/2020
Summary: The Additional District Munsif Court at Attur decreed the plaintiff's suit, declaring him the absolute owner of Item No. 1 (0.10 acres in survey no. 19/4) through adverse possession and granting permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of both suit properties. The court found that the plaintiff had sufficiently proved his long, continuous, open, and hostile possession against the defendant, who remained ex parte after failing to file a written statement despite receiving summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts