Krishnamoorthy vs Mancikam Advocate - ARUMUGAM R — 84/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s.Vii rul. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat on 14th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA130001322020
Filing Number
241/2020
Filing Date
01-07-2020
Registration No
84/2020
Registration Date
03-07-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Attur
Judge
3-Additional District Munsif, Attur
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled through Lok Adalat
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krishnamoorthy
Adv. KUMARAVEL. V.
Respondent(s)
Mancikam Advocate - ARUMUGAM R
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Additional District Munsif, Attur
Disposed
Appearance
Issue of Process
Restored
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 05-02-2026 | Issue of Process |
| 05-02-2026 | Restored |
| 05-02-2026 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Additional District Munsif Court at Attur decreed the plaintiff's suit, declaring him the absolute owner of Item No. 1 (0.10 acres in survey no. 19/4) through adverse possession and granting permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of both suit properties. The court found that the plaintiff had sufficiently proved his long, continuous, open, and hostile possession against the defendant, who remained ex parte after failing to file a written statement despite receiving summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional District Munsif Court at Attur decreed the plaintiff's suit, declaring him the absolute owner of Item No. 1 (0.10 acres in survey no. 19/4) through adverse possession and granting permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of both suit properties. The court found that the plaintiff had sufficiently proved his long, continuous, open, and hostile possession against the defendant, who remained ex parte after failing to file a written statement despite receiving summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts