Boopalan and 3 Others vs Manickam and another — 54/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OrderVIIRules1to6. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA130000992024
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
23-03-2024
Filing Number
123/2024
Filing Date
25-03-2024
Registration No
54/2024
Registration Date
25-03-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Attur
Judge
3-Additional District Munsif, Attur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Boopalan and 3 Others
Adv. RAVI R
Vijayakumar
Adv. R.RAVI RAVI
Minor Parthipan
Adv. R.RAVI RAVI
Manikandan
Adv. R.RAVI RAVI
Respondent(s)
Manickam and another
Thiyagarajan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Additional District Munsif, Attur
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Amendment | |
| 10-03-2026 | Amendment | |
| 10-02-2026 | Amendment | |
| 18-12-2025 | Amendment | |
| 21-11-2025 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Additional District Civil Court in Attur allowed the petition (I.M. 3/2025) filed by the plaintiffs/petitioners. The court ordered that respondents 3 to 6 (District Collector, Revenue Officer, Taluk Officer, and Village Administrative Officer) be added as necessary parties/defendants to the suit concerning a disputed agricultural property. The court found that proper adjudication of the land ownership dispute requires the involvement of these revenue officials, as they have issued relevant revenue documents and records related to the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional District Civil Court in Attur allowed the petition (I.M. 3/2025) filed by the plaintiffs/petitioners. The court ordered that respondents 3 to 6 (District Collector, Revenue Officer, Taluk Officer, and Village Administrative Officer) be added as necessary parties/defendants to the suit concerning a disputed agricultural property. The court found that proper adjudication of the land ownership dispute requires the involvement of these revenue officials, as they have issued relevant revenue documents and records related to the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts