Boopalan and 3 Others vs Manickam and another — 54/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OrderVIIRules1to6. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNSA130000992024

Amendment

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

23-03-2024

Filing Number

123/2024

Filing Date

25-03-2024

Registration No

54/2024

Registration Date

25-03-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Attur

Judge

3-Additional District Munsif, Attur

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section OrderVIIRules1to6
COURT FEES ACT, 1870 Section 27c

Petitioner(s)

Boopalan and 3 Others

Adv. RAVI R

Vijayakumar

Adv. R.RAVI RAVI

Minor Parthipan

Adv. R.RAVI RAVI

Manikandan

Adv. R.RAVI RAVI

Respondent(s)

Manickam and another

Thiyagarajan

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Additional District Munsif, Attur

10-04-2026

Amendment

10-03-2026

Amendment

10-02-2026

Amendment

18-12-2025

Amendment

21-11-2025

Appearance

Interim Orders

18-12-2025
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The Additional District Civil Court in Attur allowed the petition (I.M. 3/2025) filed by the plaintiffs/petitioners. The court ordered that respondents 3 to 6 (District Collector, Revenue Officer, Taluk Officer, and Village Administrative Officer) be added as necessary parties/defendants to the suit concerning a disputed agricultural property. The court found that proper adjudication of the land ownership dispute requires the involvement of these revenue officials, as they have issued relevant revenue documents and records related to the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional District Civil Court in Attur allowed the petition (I.M. 3/2025) filed by the plaintiffs/petitioners. The court ordered that respondents 3 to 6 (District Collector, Revenue Officer, Taluk Officer, and Village Administrative Officer) be added as necessary parties/defendants to the suit concerning a disputed agricultural property. The court found that proper adjudication of the land ownership dispute requires the involvement of these revenue officials, as they have issued relevant revenue documents and records related to the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Attur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case