Selvaraj.P and 2 others vs Angamuthu @ Manikam.P and 2 others Advocate - MURUGESAN. C. — 200167/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1to6. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNSA130000282017
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
200167/2017
Filing Date
17-08-2017
Registration No
200167/2017
Registration Date
17-08-2017
Court
District Munsif Court, Attur
Judge
2-Principal District Munsif, Attur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Selvaraj.P and 2 others
Adv. VANAGAMUDI K
Murugesan.P
Adv. Vanangamudi.K.R
Raja
Adv. Vanangamudi.K.R
Respondent(s)
Angamuthu @ Manikam.P and 2 others Advocate - MURUGESAN. C.
Angamuthu.A
Adv. Murugesan.C
Kala.A
Adv. Murugesan.C
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal District Munsif, Attur
Amendment
Amendment
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 06-02-2026 | Amendment |
| 06-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 21-11-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 23-10-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: Original Suit No. 167/2017 for permanent injunction was dismissed for default on 24th August 2023 by the Principal District Munsif Court, Attur. The plaintiffs failed to appear and provide representation during the hearing, resulting in dismissal without trial. No costs were awarded against either party, and the suit against defendant D1 was abated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Original Suit No. 167/2017 for permanent injunction was dismissed for default on 24th August 2023 by the Principal District Munsif Court, Attur. The plaintiffs failed to appear and provide representation during the hearing, resulting in dismissal without trial. No costs were awarded against either party, and the suit against defendant D1 was abated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts