velu vs Sundrarajan Advocate - SENTHILKUMAR.M — 413/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1to6,sec.22. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 18th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA120012542024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1451/2024
Filing Date
20-12-2024
Registration No
413/2024
Registration Date
20-12-2024
Court
Sub Court, Attur
Judge
1-Sub Judge, Attur
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
velu
Adv. CHANDRASEKARAN K
Respondent(s)
Sundrarajan Advocate - SENTHILKUMAR.M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge, Attur
Disposed
Arguments
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 11-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 27-01-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence | |
| 21-11-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Subordinate Judge at Attur, Salem District decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Velu against defendant Sundrarajan, holding the defendant liable to recover Rs. 2,45,267/- (principal of Rs. 2,00,000/- plus accrued interest) based on a valid promissory note executed on 21.01.2023. The court awarded 6% per annum interest from the suit date until realization, with a 2-month payment period, relying on the plaintiff's testimony, the executed promissory note, witness corroboration, and adverse inference drawn against the absent defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Subordinate Judge at Attur, Salem District decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Velu against defendant Sundrarajan, holding the defendant liable to recover Rs. 2,45,267/- (principal of Rs. 2,00,000/- plus accrued interest) based on a valid promissory note executed on 21.01.2023. The court awarded 6% per annum interest from the suit date until realization, with a 2-month payment period, relying on the plaintiff's testimony, the executed promissory note, witness corroboration, and adverse inference drawn against the absent defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts