Elango vs Branch Manager, Dhanalakshmi Paper Mills — 133/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section sec22. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 13th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA120008952024
Filing Number
1005/2024
Filing Date
28-Aug-2024
Registration No
133/2025
Registration Date
17-Apr-2025
Court
Sub Court, Attur
Judge
1-Sub Judge, Attur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Elango
Adv. VELMURUGAN T
Respondent(s)
-
1.Branch Manager, Dhanalakshmi Paper Mills
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Subordinate Court of Attur decreed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 2,83,937/- with 6% per annum interest from the date of suit until realization. The court found the plaintiff had proven his case through documentary evidence (legal notice, acknowledgment, and delivery receipts) and adverse inference against the defendant who failed to appear and contest the suit. Payment was ordered within 2 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub Judge, Attur
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge, Attur
-
10-Dec-2025
Part Heard
Sub Judge, Attur
-
26-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
26-Nov-2025
Part Heard
Sub Judge, Attur
-
15-Oct-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge, Attur
-
23-Sep-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge, Attur
-
03-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Sub Judge, Attur
-
22-Jul-2025
Issue of Service
Sub Judge, Attur
-
08-Jul-2025
Issue of Service
Sub Judge, Attur
-
17-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 133/2025
The Subordinate Court of Attur decreed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 2,83,937/- with 6% per annum interest from the date of suit until realization. The court found the plaintiff had proven his case through documentary evidence (legal notice, acknowledgment, and delivery receipts) and adverse inference against the defendant who failed to appear and contest the suit. Payment was ordered within 2 months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts