Shanthi Sheels vs Azhagendran — 355/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1to6. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 17th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA120006962025
Filing Number
815/2025
Filing Date
04-Sep-2025
Registration No
355/2025
Registration Date
04-Sep-2025
Court
Sub Court, Attur
Judge
1-Sub Judge, Attur
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shanthi Sheels
Adv. R.Saritha
Respondent(s)
-
1.Azhagendran
-
2.Monika
-
3.Gunaseelan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Subordinate Court of Attur decreed a partition suit granting the plaintiff (Shantha Sheela) a 1/4 share in ancestral property inherited from her grandfather and also from her deceased husband's estate under the Hindu Succession Act. The court granted a preliminary decree for partition and a permanent injunction restraining defendants from alienating the property, finding the plaintiff proved her case through documentary evidence while defendants failed to contest the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub Judge, Attur
-
10-Mar-2026
Judgement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
24-Feb-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub Judge, Attur
-
07-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge, Attur
-
03-Dec-2025
Issue of Service
Sub Judge, Attur
-
29-Oct-2025
Issue of Service
Sub Judge, Attur
-
04-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 355/2025
Summary The Subordinate Court of Attur decreed a partition suit granting the plaintiff (Shantha Sheela) a 1/4 share in ancestral property inherited from her grandfather and also from her deceased husband's estate under the Hindu Succession Act. The court granted a preliminary decree for partition and a permanent injunction restraining defendants from alienating the property, finding the plaintiff proved her case through documentary evidence while defendants failed to contest the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts