Sasiram and others vs Kumaravelu and others — 436/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section orviiru1to6. Status: Additional Issues. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNSA120005162020
Filing Number
602/2020
Filing Date
30-Jul-2020
Registration No
436/2020
Registration Date
05-Sep-2020
Court
Sub Court, Attur
Judge
1-Sub Judge, Attur
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sasiram and others
Adv. MUTHUSAMY N
-
2.Devarajan
-
3.Rajakanni
-
4.Ekambikai
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kumaravelu and others
-
2.Veerasigamani
-
3.Shanthi
-
4.Santhiya
-
5.Kumarasamy
-
6.Aravindaraj
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Additional Issues
Sub Judge, Attur
-
18-Mar-2026
Additional Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
10-Mar-2026
Additional Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
21-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
21-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
06-Nov-2025
Amendment
Sub Judge, Attur
-
04-Nov-2025
Amendment
Sub Judge, Attur
-
06-Oct-2025
Steps
Sub Judge, Attur
-
01-Sep-2025
Steps
Sub Judge, Attur
-
05-Aug-2025
Steps
Sub Judge, Attur
-
01-Jul-2025
Trial
Sub Judge, Attur
-
03-Apr-2025
Trial
Sub Judge, Attur
-
01-Feb-2025
Trial
Sub Judge, Attur
-
18-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
03-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
30-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
25-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
23-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
23-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
19-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
17-Apr-2024
IA Pending
Sub Judge, Attur
-
13-Mar-2024
IA Pending
Sub Judge, Attur
-
28-Feb-2024
Part Heard
Sub Judge, Attur
-
06-Feb-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case Summary Case No.: OS.No. 436/2020 Date: 06.02.2024 Court: Subordinate Judge, Attur Outcome: The court partially allowed the suit. Witnesses (PW-1 and related parties) testified regarding property disputes involving inheritance claims and land ownership dating back to 1971. The court found that witnesses 1 and 2 failed to prove their claims against witness 5 regarding certain property matters, while witnesses 3 and 4 were held liable for violating certain legal obligations. The court directed witnesses 3 and 4 to cease interference with witness 5's rights and imposed liability regarding property-related disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Feb-2024
Part Heard
Sub Judge, Attur
-
12-Jan-2024
Part Heard
Sub Judge, Attur
-
02-Jan-2024
Part Heard
Sub Judge, Attur
-
05-Dec-2023
Part Heard
Sub Judge, Attur
-
07-Nov-2023
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
07-Nov-2023
Part Heard
Sub Judge, Attur
-
17-Oct-2023
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge, Attur
-
27-Sep-2023
For further Proceedings
Sub Judge, Attur
-
05-Sep-2023
Trial
Sub Judge, Attur
-
25-Jul-2023
Trial
Sub Judge, Attur
-
14-Jun-2023
Trial
Sub Judge, Attur
-
06-Apr-2023
Trial
Sub Judge, Attur
-
07-Mar-2023
Trial
Sub Judge, Attur
-
06-Feb-2023
Trial
Sub Judge, Attur
-
15-Dec-2022
Trial
Sub Judge, Attur
-
23-Nov-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
27-Sep-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
27-Aug-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
03-Aug-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
15-Jun-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
08-Mar-2022
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Attur
-
07-Dec-2021
Batta
Sub Judge, Attur
-
28-Sep-2021
Batta
Sub Judge, Attur
-
29-Jun-2021
Batta
Sub Judge, Attur
-
27-Apr-2021
Batta
Sub Judge, Attur
-
03-Mar-2021
Service Pending
Sub Judge, Attur
-
22-Dec-2020
Service Pending
Sub Judge, Attur
-
08-Oct-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jul-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 436/2020
Case Summary Case No.: OS.No. 436/2020 Date: 06.02.2024 Court: Subordinate Judge, Attur Outcome: The court partially allowed the suit. Witnesses (PW-1 and related parties) testified regarding property disputes involving inheritance claims and land ownership dating back to 1971. The court found that witnesses 1 and 2 failed to prove their claims against witness 5 regarding certain property matters, while witnesses 3 and 4 were held liable for violating certain legal obligations. The court directed witnesses 3 and 4 to cease interference with witness 5's rights and imposed liability regarding property-related disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts