Kandasamygoundar Fly Ash Bricks Proprietor of K Ravikumar vs Chellam — 54/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNSA110003322024
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
e-Filing Number
17-04-2024
Filing Number
332/2024
Filing Date
17-04-2024
Registration No
54/2024
Registration Date
05-12-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Omalur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kandasamygoundar Fly Ash Bricks Proprietor of K Ravikumar
Adv. A. SUNDRAM
Respondent(s)
Chellam
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: S.D.C. 54/2024 Court: Fast Track Court, Omalur Date: October 27, 2025 The complainant Ravikumar's examination-in-chief was recorded, wherein he testified that the accused Chellam and his associate worked for the complainant's brother Vijayakumar and incurred expenses. The complainant denied claims that he did not personally know the accused, falsely filed the case, or lacked financial capacity to give the loan. No cross-examination was conducted. The hearing concluded at 1:33 PM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: S.D.C. 54/2024 Court: Fast Track Court, Omalur Date: October 27, 2025 The complainant Ravikumar's examination-in-chief was recorded, wherein he testified that the accused Chellam and his associate worked for the complainant's brother Vijayakumar and incurred expenses. The complainant denied claims that he did not personally know the accused, falsely filed the case, or lacked financial capacity to give the loan. No cross-examination was conducted. The hearing concluded at 1:33 PM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts