Kandasamygoundar Fly Ash Bricks Proprietor of K Ravikumar vs Chellam — 54/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 24-Mar-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNSA110003322024

e-Filing Number

17-04-2024

Filing Number

332/2024

Filing Date

17-Apr-2024

Registration No

54/2024

Registration Date

05-Dec-2024

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Omalur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

Last updated 18-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kandasamygoundar Fly Ash Bricks Proprietor of K Ravikumar

    Adv. A. SUNDRAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chellam

Case History

  1. 24-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  11. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  12. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  13. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  14. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  15. 13-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  16. 06-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  17. 27-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Case No.: S.D.C. 54/2024 Court: Fast Track Court, Omalur Date: October 27, 2025 The complainant Ravikumar's examination-in-chief was recorded, wherein he testified that the accused Chellam and his associate worked for the complainant's brother Vijayakumar and incurred expenses. The complainant denied claims that he did not personally know the accused, falsely filed the case, or lacked financial capacity to give the loan. No cross-examination was conducted. The hearing concluded at 1:33 PM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  19. 25-Oct-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  20. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  21. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  22. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  23. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  24. 11-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  25. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  26. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  27. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  28. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  29. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  30. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  31. 08-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  32. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  33. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  34. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  35. 09-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  36. 21-May-2025

    For Discovery / Inspection / Production

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  37. 23-Apr-2025

    For Discovery / Inspection / Production

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  38. 20-Mar-2025

    For Discovery / Inspection / Production

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  39. 27-Feb-2025

    For Discovery / Inspection / Production

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  40. 06-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  41. 02-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur

  42. 05-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 17-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: S.D.C. 54/2024 Court: Fast Track Court, Omalur Date: October 27, 2025 The complainant Ravikumar's examination-in-chief was recorded, wherein he testified that the accused Chellam and his associate worked for the complainant's brother Vijayakumar and incurred expenses. The complainant denied claims that he did not personally know the accused, falsely filed the case, or lacked financial capacity to give the loan. No cross-examination was conducted. The hearing concluded at 1:33 PM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case