Kandasamygoundar Fly Ash Bricks Proprietor of K Ravikumar vs Sasikumar — 56/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNSA110003302024
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
e-Filing Number
17-04-2024
Filing Number
330/2024
Filing Date
17-04-2024
Registration No
56/2024
Registration Date
12-12-2024
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Omalur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kandasamygoundar Fly Ash Bricks Proprietor of K Ravikumar
Adv. A. SUNDRAM
Respondent(s)
Sasikumar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court: Fast Track Court, Omalur (Criminal) Case No.: S.D.C. 56/2024 Date: September 20, 2025 The court examined the complainant Ravikumar's cross-examination regarding a dispute over Rs. 2 lakh worth of cement stones and sand allegedly supplied by the accused Sasiskumar on 16.01.2024. The complainant acknowledged that supporting documentation for the transaction was not filed with the court but stated willingness to produce it, and indicated no objection to presumptions drawn against him for non-filing. The court recorded the completion of cross-examination with no further cross-examination required, adjourning the matter for continued proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: Fast Track Court, Omalur (Criminal) Case No.: S.D.C. 56/2024 Date: September 20, 2025 The court examined the complainant Ravikumar's cross-examination regarding a dispute over Rs. 2 lakh worth of cement stones and sand allegedly supplied by the accused Sasiskumar on 16.01.2024. The complainant acknowledged that supporting documentation for the transaction was not filed with the court but stated willingness to produce it, and indicated no objection to presumptions drawn against him for non-filing. The court recorded the completion of cross-examination with no further cross-examination required, adjourning the matter for continued proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts