S. Balasubramani vs Murugan — 77/2021
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNSA110001452021
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
77/2021
Filing Date
29-09-2021
Registration No
77/2021
Registration Date
30-09-2021
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Omalur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Balasubramani
Adv. R. Ezhilarasu
Respondent(s)
Murugan
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur
Evidence
Evidence
Questioning
Questioning
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 02-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 24-02-2026 | Questioning |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: S.D.C. No. 77/2021, Fast Track Court, Omalur (Tamil Nadu) Date: January 29, 2026 Outcome: The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of witness Indhumathi on January 29, 2026, in this criminal case involving a property transaction dispute between complainant Balasubramani and accused Murugan. The witness's deposition revealed significant inconsistencies regarding the sale value of the property (₹9,00,000 vs ₹20,00,000), the existence of prior agreements, and discrepancies in accompanying documents, which the court noted in the examination record. The proceedings concluded at 4:21 PM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: S.D.C. No. 77/2021, Fast Track Court, Omalur (Tamil Nadu) Date: January 29, 2026 Outcome: The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of witness Indhumathi on January 29, 2026, in this criminal case involving a property transaction dispute between complainant Balasubramani and accused Murugan. The witness's deposition revealed significant inconsistencies regarding the sale value of the property (₹9,00,000 vs ₹20,00,000), the existence of prior agreements, and discrepancies in accompanying documents, which the court noted in the examination record. The proceedings concluded at 4:21 PM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts