B.Mohanraj vs Arun Advocate - G. Ilayaraja — 300049/2018
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 200r/w138,142. Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNSA110000462018
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
300049/2018
Filing Date
09-11-2018
Registration No
300049/2018
Registration Date
09-11-2018
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Omalur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
B.Mohanraj
Adv. R.MOhankumar
Respondent(s)
Arun Advocate - G. Ilayaraja
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 06-03-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 07-02-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 30-01-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 02-01-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The petition filed under Section 311 CrPC by the accused (Arun) to recall PW1 for cross-examination was allowed. The court held that cross-examination of PW1 is essential for reaching a just decision and, applying principles of natural justice, granted the accused an opportunity to cross-examine the witness. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 100 to the Legal Services Authority by 30.11.2020, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The petition filed under Section 311 CrPC by the accused (Arun) to recall PW1 for cross-examination was allowed. The court held that cross-examination of PW1 is essential for reaching a just decision and, applying principles of natural justice, granted the accused an opportunity to cross-examine the witness. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 100 to the Legal Services Authority by 30.11.2020, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts