Sanjay Gandhi vs Ramesh Advocate - KATHIRAVAN. P. — 34/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142,. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNSA110000322023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
32/2023
Filing Date
03-06-2023
Registration No
34/2023
Registration Date
09-06-2023
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Omalur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay Gandhi
Adv. Mahenthyran.T.S
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Advocate - KATHIRAVAN. P.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magestrial level, Omalur
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Ramesh of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that while the complainant established initial statutory presumptions, the accused successfully rebutted them through cross-examination evidence and documents showing the cheque was connected to the accused's son's employment at Sangamam Cooperative Society, not a personal loan. The court held that the complainant failed to prove the existence of legally enforceable debt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly due to discrepancies in the loan date and lack of independent witness corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Ramesh of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding that while the complainant established initial statutory presumptions, the accused successfully rebutted them through cross-examination evidence and documents showing the cheque was connected to the accused's son's employment at Sangamam Cooperative Society, not a personal loan. The court held that the complainant failed to prove the existence of legally enforceable debt beyond reasonable doubt, particularly due to discrepancies in the loan date and lack of independent witness corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts