SI OF POLICE OMALUR PS vs SATHYAMOORTHI AND 3 OTHERS — 2739/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),117(2),351(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 21st April 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNSA100053792025
e-Filing Number
04-09-2025
Filing Number
6123/2025
Filing Date
06-Sep-2025
Registration No
2739/2025
Registration Date
16-Sep-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Omalur
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate, Omalur
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 08-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SI OF POLICE OMALUR PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
-
1.SATHYAMOORTHI AND 3 OTHERS
-
2.SATHIYAKUMAR
-
3.SABINKUMAR
-
4.RAGUPATHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate Court of Omalur acquitted all four accused (Sathiyamoorthy, Sathiyakumar, Sabinkumar, and Ragupathi) of charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 for alleged abuse, assault, and criminal intimidation. The court found the prosecution's case insufficient, noting the main witness turned hostile, admitted he filed the complaint only on suspicion, and the injuries sustained appeared to result from an accidental fall in a crowded gathering rather than any deliberate act by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Omalur
-
17-Apr-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate, Omalur
-
10-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate, Omalur
-
10-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Omalur
-
07-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Omalur
-
18-Nov-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate, Omalur
-
16-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2739/2025
The Judicial Magistrate Court of Omalur acquitted all four accused (Sathiyamoorthy, Sathiyakumar, Sabinkumar, and Ragupathi) of charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 for alleged abuse, assault, and criminal intimidation. The court found the prosecution's case insufficient, noting the main witness turned hostile, admitted he filed the complaint only on suspicion, and the injuries sustained appeared to result from an accidental fall in a crowded gathering rather than any deliberate act by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts