SI OF POLICE MAGUDAMCHAVADI POLICE STATION vs DEVARAJ — 960/2025

Case under Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 24(1). Disposed: Uncontested--Judgement on admission on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNSA090024862025

e-Filing Number

11-12-2025

Filing Number

2485/2025

Filing Date

12-Dec-2025

Registration No

960/2025

Registration Date

15-Dec-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankari

Judge

4-Judicial Magistrate - II, Sankari

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Judgement on admission

Last updated 08-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

314

Police Station

Md.CHOULTRY P.S

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Acts 2003 Section 24(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI OF POLICE MAGUDAMCHAVADI POLICE STATION

    Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE MAGUDANCHAVADI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEVARAJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Sankari convicted accused Devaraj of violating Section 24(1) of the Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act, finding sufficient evidence against him despite his absence. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 200 with a default penalty of one month simple imprisonment, and dispensed with the accused's personal attendance through online proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Sankari

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Sankari

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Sankari

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate - II, Sankari

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 960/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Sankari convicted accused Devaraj of violating Section 24(1) of the Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act, finding sufficient evidence against him despite his absence. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 200 with a default penalty of one month simple imprisonment, and dispensed with the accused's personal attendance through online proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case