si of police sankari ps vs AJAY — 410/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 29th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNSA090023282025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-11-2025

Filing Number

2327/2025

Filing Date

24-11-2025

Registration No

410/2025

Registration Date

26-11-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankari

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

433

Police Station

Sankari P.S

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

TN PROHIBITION ACT Section 4(1)(C)

Petitioner(s)

si of police sankari ps (Police Station)

Adv. si of Police sankari

Respondent(s)

AJAY

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate - I, Sankari

29-04-2026

Disposed

28-04-2026

Judgement

27-04-2026

Questioning

24-04-2026

Evidence

21-04-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

29-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted Ajay of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for alleged illegal liquor possession and sale. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to: absence of independent witnesses at the public seizure location, non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements (no samples drawn, no chemical analysis), lack of evidence proving possession was for sale rather than personal consumption, and reliance solely on police officer testimony without corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted Ajay of charges under Section 4(1)(C) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act for alleged illegal liquor possession and sale. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to: absence of independent witnesses at the public seizure location, non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements (no samples drawn, no chemical analysis), lack of evidence proving possession was for sale rather than personal consumption, and reliance solely on police officer testimony without corroboration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Sankari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case